Evaluation of a score for identifying hospital stays that trigger a pharmacist intervention: integration into a clinical decision support system

被引:0
作者
Robert, Laurine [1 ]
Vidoni, Nathalie [2 ]
Gerard, Erwin [3 ]
Chazard, Emmanuel [3 ]
Odou, Pascal [4 ]
Rousseliere, Chloe [1 ]
Decaudin, Bertrand [4 ]
机构
[1] CHU Lille, Inst Pharm, Rue Philippe Marache, F-59000 Lille, France
[2] Catholic Univ Louvain, Pharm Dept, Clin Univ St Luc, Brussels, Belgium
[3] Univ Lille, CHU Lille, ULR METRICS Evaluat Technol Sante & Prat Med 2694, F-59000 Lille, France
[4] Univ Lille, CHU Lille, ULR GRITA Grp Rech Formes Injectables & Technol As, F-59000 Lille, France
关键词
clinical pharmacist; clinical decision support system; scoring; pharmacist intervention; MODELS; RISK;
D O I
10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf030
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives The objective of the study was to determine, after medication review, the patient risk score threshold that would distinguish between stays with prescriptions triggering pharmacist intervention (PI) and stays with prescriptions not triggering PI.Materials and Methods The study was retrospective and observational, conducted in the clinical pharmacy team. The patient risk score was adapted from a Canadian score and was integrated in the clinical decision support system (CDSS). For each hospital stay, the score was calculated at the beginning of hospitalization and we retrospectively showed if a medication review and a PI were conducted. Then, the optimal patient risk score threshold was determined to help pharmacist in optimizing medication review.Results During the study, 973 (56.7%) medication reviews were performed and 248 (25.5%) led to a PI. After analyzing sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of different thresholds, the threshold of 4 was deemed discriminating to identify hospital stays likely to lead to a PI following a medication review. At this threshold, 600 hospital stays would have been detected (33.3% of the latter led to a PI), and 5.0% of stays with a medication review would not have been detected even though they were hospital stays that had triggered a PI.Discussion and Conclusion Integration of a patient risk score in a CDSS can help clinical pharmacist to target hospital stays likely to trigger a PI. However, an optimal threshold is difficult to determine. Constructing and using a score in practice should be organized with the local clinical pharmacy team, in order to understand the tool's limitations and maximize its use in detecting at-risk drug prescriptions. Our study investigates the use of a patient risk score integrated in a clinical decision support system (CDSS) for pharmacists. Clinical decision support systems are tools that detect in real time at-risk situations. Clinical pharmacist daily reviewed drug prescriptions, and we aimed at developing a patient risk score to alert on prescriptions which is more likely to trigger a pharmacist intervention to medical ward. The use of a score could help clinical pharmacist to prioritize themselves by maximizing their capacity to detect at-risk drug prescriptions, but finding the optimal threshold is complex and need to be improved to be used in practice. This research provides a first work to develop a score in a CDSS to help clinical pharmacist in medication review. Collaboration with the CDSS's developers is required to evaluate the routine use of the patient risk score by clinical pharmacy teams.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Implementing and Evaluating a National Integrated Digital Registry and Clinical Decision Support System in Early Intervention in Psychosis Services (Early Psychosis Informatics Into Care): Co-Designed Protocol
    Griffiths, Sian Lowri
    Murray, Graham K.
    Logeswaran, Yanakan
    Ainsworth, John
    Allan, Sophie M.
    Campbell, Niyah
    Drake, Richard J.
    Katshu, Mohammad Zia Ul Haq
    Machin, Matthew
    Pope, Megan A.
    Sullivan, Sarah A.
    Waring, Justin
    Bogatsu, Tumelo
    Kane, Julie
    Weetman, Tyler
    Johnson, Sonia
    Kirkbride, James B.
    Upthegrove, Rachel
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2024, 13
  • [42] Assessing the Impact of an Advanced Clinical Decision Support System on Medication Safety and Hospital Readmissions in an Innovative Transitional Care Model: A Pilot Study
    Bingham, Jennifer M.
    Baugham, Lindsey
    Hilaneh, Andriana
    Tranchina, Karley
    Arku, Daniel
    Eckert, Becka
    Scovis, Nicole
    Turgeon, Jacques
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (08)
  • [43] The effect of a clinical decision support system on prompting an intervention for risky alcohol use in a primary care smoking cessation program: a cluster randomized trial
    Nadia Minian
    Dolly Baliunas
    Aliya Noormohamed
    Laurie Zawertailo
    Norman Giesbrecht
    Christian S. Hendershot
    Bernard Le Foll
    Jürgen Rehm
    Andriy V. Samokhvalov
    Peter L. Selby
    Implementation Science, 14
  • [44] Implementation of a Nutrition-Oriented Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) for Weight Loss during the COVID-19 Epidemic in a Hospital Outpatient Clinic: A 3-Month Controlled Intervention Study
    Detopoulou, Paraskevi
    Papandreou, Panos
    Papadopoulou, Lida
    Skouroliakou, Maria
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 13 (16):
  • [45] The effect of a clinical decision support system on prompting an intervention for risky alcohol use in a primary care smoking cessation program: a cluster randomized trial
    Minian, Nadia
    Baliunas, Dolly
    Noormohamed, Aliya
    Zawertailo, Laurie
    Giesbrecht, Norman
    Hendershot, Christian S.
    Le Foll, Bernard
    Rehm, Juergen
    Samokhvalov, Andriy V.
    Selby, Peter L.
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2019, 14 (01)
  • [46] Use of quick sequential organ failure assessment score-based sepsis clinical decision support system may be helpful to predict sepsis development
    Kim, Youn-Jung
    Lee, Jae-Ho
    Lee, Sang-Wook
    Kim, Won Young
    SIGNA VITAE, 2021, 17 (05) : 86 - 94
  • [47] Diagnostic Performance, Triage Safety, and Usability of a Clinical Decision Support System Within a University Hospital Emergency Department: Algorithm Performance and Usability Study
    Maatta, Juhani
    Lindell, Rony
    Hayward, Nick
    Martikainen, Susanna
    Honkanen, Katri
    Inkala, Matias
    Hirvonen, Petteri
    Martikainen, Tero J.
    JMIR MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2023, 11
  • [48] Evaluation of ML-Based Clinical Decision Support Tool to Replace an Existing Tool in an Academic Health System: Lessons Learned
    Woo, Myung
    Alhanti, Brooke
    Lusk, Sam
    Dunston, Felicia
    Blackwelder, Stephen
    Lytle, Kay S.
    Goldstein, Benjamin A.
    Bedoya, Armando
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2020, 10 (03): : 1 - 12
  • [49] Qualitative Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Clinical Decision Support System to Guide Rhythm Management of Atrial Fibrillation: Survey Study
    Stacy, John
    Kim, Rachel
    Barrett, Christopher
    Sekar, Balaviknesh
    Simon, Steven
    Banaei-Kashani, Farnoush
    Rosenberg, Michael A.
    JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2022, 6 (08)
  • [50] Evaluation of an electronic clinical decision support system (DeSSBack) to improve low back pain management: a pilot cluster randomized controlled trial
    Firzara, Abdul Malik Tun
    Teo, Chin Hai
    Teh, Shu Yi
    Su, Je Yu
    Zaini, Hana Salwani Mohd
    Suhaimi, Anwar
    Ng, Wei Leik
    Danaee, Mahmoud
    Stevenson, Kay
    Mallen, Christian David
    Ng, Chirk Jenn
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2023, 40 (5-6) : 742 - 752