The impact of accountability for illegal operation and investment on investment efficiency of SOEs: Evidence from China☆

被引:0
作者
Wang, Li [1 ]
Qin, Dongqian [1 ]
Pan, Lu [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhongnan Univ Econ & Law, Sch Accounting, 182 Nanhu Ave, Wuhan 430073, Hubei, Peoples R China
基金
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助;
关键词
Accountability for illegal operation and; investment (AIOI); Investment efficiency; State-owned Enterprises (SOEs); Agency costs; Quality of information communication; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; AGENCY COSTS; FINANCE; OWNERSHIP; INSTITUTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eap.2025.04.007
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The establishment of an accountability system is a significant step in China's ongoing reform of state-owned enterprises (SOEs). This study uses a sample of A-share Chinese listed firms (excluding financial and cultural firms) from 2013 to 2022, employing a difference-in-differences method to examine the impact of accountability system reform on the investment efficiency of SOEs. The findings indicate that accountability for illegal operation and investment (AIOI) substantially enhances the investment efficiency of SOEs, particularly for firms previously characterized by over-investment. Further analysis reveals that the primary mechanisms through which AIOI influences the investment efficiency of SOEs are the reduction of agency costs and the improvement of information communication quality. Additionally, the study finds that the positive impact of AIOI on investment efficiency is more pronounced in SOEs situated in non-western regions, regions with lower levels of corruption, during the initial years of an executive's tenure, and in SOEs where executives are close to retirement. These results underscore the pivotal role of AIOI in boosting the investment efficiency of SOEs and suggest that it encourages the government to take a more active role in supervising and guiding SOEs' activities.
引用
收藏
页码:731 / 748
页数:18
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   Law, finance, and economic growth in China [J].
Allen, F ;
Qian, J ;
Qian, MJ .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 77 (01) :57-116
[2]   Agency costs and ownership structure [J].
Ang, JS ;
Cole, RA ;
Lin, JW .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2000, 55 (01) :81-106
[3]   CEO decision horizon and firm performance: An empirical investigation [J].
Antia, Murad ;
Pantzalis, Christos ;
Park, Jung Chul .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2010, 16 (03) :288-301
[4]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[5]   Dual-class stock structure and firm investment [J].
Beladi, Hamid ;
Hu, May ;
Yang, JingJing ;
Zhu, Ruicheng .
FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 47
[6]   Enjoying the quiet life? Corporate governance and managerial preferences [J].
Bertrand, M ;
Mullainathan, S .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2003, 111 (05) :1043-1075
[7]   How does financial reporting quality relate to investment efficiency? [J].
Biddle, Gary C. ;
Hilary, Gilles ;
Verdi, Rodrigo S. .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2009, 48 (2-3) :112-131
[8]   The Impact of Occupational Community on the Quality of Internal Control [J].
Campbell, Shelagh ;
Li, Yingqi ;
Yu, Junli ;
Zhang, Zhou .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2016, 139 (02) :271-285
[9]   Insecure property rights and government ownership of firms [J].
Che, JH ;
Qian, YY .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1998, 113 (02) :467-496
[10]  
Chen Gong-meng., 2006, EMERG MARK REV, V7, P82, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.EMEMAR.2005.05.003