Diabetes Management Through Remote Patient Monitoring: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Program Enrollment and Attrition

被引:0
作者
Su, Dejun [1 ]
Michaud, Tzeyu L. [1 ,2 ]
Ern, Jessica [2 ]
Li, Jian [3 ]
Chen, Liwei [4 ]
Li, Yan [5 ]
Shi, Lu [6 ]
Zhang, Donglan [7 ]
Andersen, Jennifer [8 ]
Pagan, Jose A. [9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Promot, Omaha, NE 68198 USA
[2] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Coll Publ Hlth, Ctr Reducing Hlth Dispar, Omaha, NE 68198 USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Fielding Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Hlth Sci, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Fielding Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[5] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Shanghai 200025, Peoples R China
[6] Pace Univ, Coll Hlth Profess, New York, NY 10038 USA
[7] NYU, Dept Fdn Med, Div Hlth Serv Res, Grossman Long Isl Sch Med, Mineola, NY 11501 USA
[8] Univ Arkansas Med Sci Northwest, Dept Internal Med, Div Community Hlth & Res, Springdale, AR 72762 USA
[9] NYU, Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Publ Hlth Policy & Management, New York, NY 10003 USA
关键词
remote patient monitoring; diabetes management; program reach; program enrollment; program attrition; mixed methods; ACTIVATION;
D O I
10.3390/healthcare13070698
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Despite the growing use of remote patient monitoring (RPM) in diabetes management, few studies have assessed program enrollment and attrition. This study adopted a mixed-methods approach to examining factors linked to program enrollment and attrition amongst a large sample of patients who went through RPM in diabetes management. Methods: Based on quantitative data from the Remote Interventions Improving Specialty Complex Care program conducted in Nebraska from 2014 to 2018, chi-squared or t tests were used to compare three groups of patients with diabetes who had been contacted for program participation: those who completed the intervention, withdrew from the intervention, or declined to participate. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with program dropout. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted to assess patient feedback based on semi-structured interviews with patients from the three groups. Results: Out of the 1993 patients with diabetes invited for participation, 13% (n = 256) declined to participate, 16% (n = 317) withdrew before completion, and 71% (n = 1420) completed the intervention. Being younger or having poorer health (as indicated by higher blood glucose or blood pressure) at the baseline was associated with higher odds of program withdrawal. The top reason patients cited for declining participation or withdrawal from RPM was not having enough time to complete the intervention. Patients who declined to participate mentioned that an offer of incentives or more information at the beginning of the intervention may increase their motivation for participation. Conclusions: Being younger or having poorer health at the baseline was associated with higher odds of withdrawing from the RPM program. Future RPM programs can increase program retention by becoming more responsive to the health needs of vulnerable patients who struggle with managing their diabetes or related comorbidities at the baseline.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Racial Disparities in Diabetes Management Outcomes: Evidence from a Remote Patient Monitoring Program for Type 2 Diabetic Patients [J].
Andersen, Jennifer A. ;
Scoggins, Dylan ;
Michaud, Tzeyu ;
Wan, Neng ;
Wen, Ming ;
Su, Dejun .
TELEMEDICINE AND E-HEALTH, 2021, 27 (01) :55-61
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Telemedicine, telehealth, and health information technology
[3]   Telehealth interventions to reduce management complications in type 1 diabetes: A review [J].
Balkhi, Amanda M. ;
Reid, Adam M. ;
Westen, Sarah C. ;
Olsen, Brian ;
Janicke, David M. ;
Geffken, Gary R. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF DIABETES, 2015, 6 (03) :371-379
[5]   How do People with Different Levels of Activation Self-Manage their Chronic Conditions? [J].
Dixon, Anna ;
Hibbard, Judith ;
Tusler, Martin .
PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2009, 2 (04) :257-268
[6]   Who does not participate in telehealth trials and why? A cross-sectional survey [J].
Foster, Alexis ;
Horspool, Kimberley A. ;
Edwards, Louisa ;
Thomas, Clare L. ;
Salisbury, Chris ;
Montgomery, Alan A. ;
O'Cathain, Alicia .
TRIALS, 2015, 16
[7]   Disparities in telemedicine use and payment policies in the United States between 2019 and 2023 [J].
Gage, Anna D. ;
Knight, Megan A. ;
Bintz, Corinne ;
Aldridge, Robert W. ;
Angelino, Olivia ;
Dieleman, Joseph L. ;
Dirac, M. Ashworth ;
Dwyer-Lindgren, Laura ;
Hay, Simon I. ;
Lozano, Rafael ;
Mokdad, Ali H. ;
Haakenstad, Annie .
COMMUNICATIONS MEDICINE, 2025, 5 (01)
[8]   Using RE-AIM metrics to evaluate diabetes self-management support interventions [J].
Glasgow, RE ;
Nelson, CC ;
Strycker, LA ;
King, DK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2006, 30 (01) :67-73
[9]   Disparities in Telemedicine Use for Subspecialty Diabetes Care During COVID-19 Shelter-In-Place Orders [J].
Haynes, Sarah C. ;
Kompala, Tejaswi ;
Neinstein, Aaron ;
Rosenthal, Jennifer ;
Crossen, Stephanie .
JOURNAL OF DIABETES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 15 (05) :986-992
[10]   Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure [J].
Hibbard, JH ;
Mahoney, ER ;
Stockard, J ;
Tusler, M .
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2005, 40 (06) :1918-1930