Science and society in Ireland: examining public trust in scientists against a global background

被引:0
作者
Roche, Joseph [1 ]
Hurley, Mairead [1 ]
Fowler, Karen [1 ]
McConville, Amelia [1 ]
Taylor, Aoife [1 ]
Mede, Niels G. [2 ]
Cologna, Viktoria [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Trinity Coll Dublin, Sch Educ, Sci & Soc Res Grp, 3096 Arts Bldg, Dublin, Ireland
[2] Univ Zurich, Dept Commun & Media Res, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Coll Helveticum, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Trust in scientists; science communication; science education; public engagement with science; survey; QUALITATIVE CONTENT-ANALYSIS; HIGHER-EDUCATION; POLICY; CHALLENGES; CURRICULUM; CULTURE; CRISIS;
D O I
10.1080/03323315.2025.2488804
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Public trust in scientists is vital for navigating complex global challenges, influencing evidence-informed policy, and promoting societal well-being. However, concerns exist about a potential crisis of trust in science, fuelled by misinformation, conspiracy theories, and science-related populism. The Trust in Science and Science-Related Populism (TISP) study investigated public perceptions of scientists across 68 countries. This paper examines the TISP findings for Ireland, focusing on public trust in scientists and the implications for the Irish educational landscape. The study reveals that trust in scientists in Ireland is generally moderate to high, exceeding global averages, but notably lower among younger respondents. Regression analyses show a strong association between trust in scientific methods and overall trust in scientists, highlighting the importance of robust science education with a strong emphasis on science communication. Qualitative analysis of open-ended responses reveals a strong expectation that scientists should embody professionalism, integrity, and continuous self-improvement. These findings suggest a need for targeted science education and communication efforts in Ireland, emphasising critical thinking skills, understanding of the scientific process, and the ethical responsibilities of scientists. Promoting transparency, dialogue, and public participation in scientific endeavours will help foster a more robust and trusting relationship between science and society in Ireland.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 118 条
[1]  
Algan Y, 2021, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V118, DOI [10.1073/pnas.2108576118|1of8, 10.1073/pnas.2108576118]
[2]   Missing Voices: Examining How Misinformation-Susceptible Individuals From Underrepresented Communities Engage, Perceive, and Combat Science Misinformation [J].
Amazeen, Michelle A. ;
Vasquez, Rosalynn A. ;
Krishna, Arunima ;
Ji, Yi Grace ;
Su, Chao Chris ;
Cummings, James J. .
SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2024, 46 (01) :3-35
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Review of the Allocation Model for Funding Higher Education Institutions
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, ORG EC COOPERATION D, V3rd
[5]  
Baker M, 2016, NATURE, V533, P452, DOI 10.1038/533452a
[6]  
Besley JC., 2013, Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, V33, P12, DOI [10.1177/0270467613496723, DOI 10.1177/0270467613496723]
[7]   Reassessing the Variables Used to Measure Public Perceptions of Scientists [J].
Besley, John C. ;
Lee, Nicole M. ;
Pressgrove, Geah .
SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2021, 43 (01) :3-32
[8]   What are you assessing when you measure "trust" in scientists with a direct measure? [J].
Besley, John C. C. ;
Tiffany, Leigh Anne .
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2023, 32 (06) :709-726
[9]   Public health and public trust: Survey evidence from the Ebola Virus Disease epidemic in Liberia [J].
Blair, Robert A. ;
Morse, Benjamin S. ;
Tsai, Lily L. .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2017, 172 :89-97
[10]  
Bonetta L., 2008, Science, V322, P773, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1126/science.322.5902.773, DOI 10.1126/SCIENCE.322.5902.773]