A systematic review of reciprocal peer observation in higher education

被引:0
作者
Corcelles-Seuba, M. [1 ]
Ortiz, M. [2 ]
O'Leary, M. [3 ]
Duran, D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ramon Llull, FPCEE Blanquerna, Cister 34, Barcelona 08022, Spain
[2] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Dept Basic Dev & Educ Psychol, Bellaterra, Spain
[3] Birmingham City Univ, Coll Educ & Social Work, Fac Hlth Educ & Life Sci, Birmingham, England
关键词
Peer observation of teaching; reciprocal peer observation; collaborative observation; teacher development; professional learning; higher education; PROFESSIONAL-DEVELOPMENT; REFLECTIVE PRACTICE; TEACHERS; PERSPECTIVES; FEEDBACK; TUTORS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1080/19415257.2025.2480768
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This article presents a systematic literature review focused on the collaborative approach of Reciprocal Peer Observation (RPO) in Higher Education (HE). The aim was to analyse the effectiveness of RPO on Teacher Professional Development (TPD). Following the PRISMA protocol, 57 journal articles were analysed for their research characteristics and empirical evidence on the benefits and challenges of RPO for teachers, students, and institutions. Findings underscore RPO's growing interest and versatility (pairs/groups, intra/interdisciplinary, face-to-face/online) to meet the diverse TPD needs in HE. Qualitative studies were the most common research design (77.19%), providing compelling evidence of teachers' perceptions of the RPO's effectiveness for TPD and fostering collegiality. However, RPO's impact on improving teaching practice and student learning remains unclear. Therefore, RPO shows promise as a collaborative TPD approach in HE, but further research using mixed methods designs is needed to understand its full impact on teaching and learning. Challenges for effective RPO practice include ensuring constructive feedback and a meaningful process for teachers. The studies reviewed highlight the crucial role of HE institutions in managing RPO within a formal TPD programme. Addressing challenges and institutional support can enhance RPO's effectiveness and promote continuous professional growth among teachers in HE.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 91 条
[51]   Online peer observation: Reflections on a process-based job-embedded professional development activity through video recordings [J].
Incecay, Volkan ;
Dikilitas, Kenan .
TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION, 2022, 120
[52]   Peer review of teaching in Australian higher education: a systematic review [J].
Johnston, Alexandra L. ;
Baik, Chi ;
Chester, Andrea .
HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 41 (02) :390-404
[53]   'In their shoes': exploring a modified approach to peer observation of teaching in a university setting [J].
Kenny, Ailbhe ;
Mitchell, Eamonn ;
Chroinin, Deirdre Ni ;
Vaughan, Elaine ;
Murtagh, Elaine .
INNOVATIONS IN EDUCATION AND TEACHING INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 51 (02) :218-229
[54]   Enhancing Teaching Quality Through Peer Review of Teaching [J].
Lomas, Laurie ;
Nicholls, Gill .
QUALITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2005, 11 (02) :137-149
[55]   Research on peer coaching in preservice teacher education - A review of literature [J].
Lu, Hsiu-Lien .
TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION, 2010, 26 (04) :748-753
[56]   Developing higher education teaching skills through peer observation and collaborative reflection [J].
Martin, GA ;
Double, JM .
INNOVATIONS IN EDUCATION AND TRAINING INTERNATIONAL, 1998, 35 (02) :161-170
[57]  
Martnez A.E., 2018, Revista Complutense de Educacin, V29, p1365 1380, DOI [10.5209/rced.55431, DOI 10.5209/RCED.55431]
[58]   Peer observation as teaching evaluation approach: An attempt to review the research area [J].
Michek, Stanislav ;
Perutkova, Monika ;
Brichova, Marie .
ERPA INTERNATIONAL CONGRESSES ON EDUCATION 2015 (ERPA 2015), 2016, 26
[59]   Interdisciplinary Class Observation in Higher Education: Lessons Learned from the Professional Development Experience of Four Teachers [J].
Miranda, Joana P. ;
Batista, Mariana ;
Duarte, Cristina ;
Sanches, Tatiana .
EDUCATION SCIENCES, 2021, 11 (11)
[60]  
Moher D., 2009, BMJ, V339, pb2535, DOI [10.1136/bmj.b2535, DOI 10.1136/BMJ.B2535, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535]