Effects of integrating self-regulation scaffolding supported by chatbot and online collaborative reflection on students' learning in an artificial intelligence course

被引:0
作者
Tsai, Chia-Wen [1 ]
Lee, Lynne [2 ]
Lin, Michael Yu-Ching [3 ]
Cheng, Yih-Ping [1 ]
Lin, Chih-Hsien [4 ]
Tsai, Meng-Chuan [5 ]
机构
[1] Ming Chuan Univ, Dept Informat Management, 5 De Ming Rd, Taipei 333, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[2] Ming Chuan Univ, Int Business & Trade Program, 250 Zhong Shan N Rd,Sec 5, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Ming Chuan Univ, Informat Technol & Management Program, 250 Zhong Shan N Rd,Sec 5, Taipei, Taiwan
[4] Ming Chuan Univ, Int Acad Publicat Res Ctr, 250 Zhong Shan N Rd,Sec 5, Taipei, Taiwan
[5] Da Yeh Univ, Dept Sport Hlth & Management, 168 Univ Rd, Changhua 51591, Taiwan
关键词
Cooperative/collaborative learning; Distance education and online learning; Pedagogical issues; Teaching/learning strategies; 21st century abilities; ACADEMIC STRESS; LONELINESS; COLLEGE; INTERVENTION; ACHIEVEMENT; PERFORMANCE; EDUCATION; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105305
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Artificial intelligence (AI) includes complex concepts and could be difficult for non-computer or information students, and they may experience difficulties in an AI course. In order to develop students' AI skills, regulate their academic stress, and reduce student loneliness, the researchers in this study integrated self-regulation scaffolding (supported by a chatbot designed in this study) with online collaborative reflection, and investigated their effects on students' learning. The researchers conducted a quasi-experiment to explore the effects of self-regulation scaffolding and online collaborative reflection. The participants in this experiment were 116 undergraduates from three classes (groups) of a non-computer department taking a compulsory course titled 'Introduction to Artificial Intelligence'. The experimental groups in this study included the first class (G1) simultaneously receiving the interventions of self-regulation scaffolding and online collaborative reflection, as well as the second class (G2) only receiving the intervention of self-regulation scaffolding. The last class (G3), that received a traditional teaching method (non-self-regulation scaffolding and non-online collaborative reflection) in an online AI course, served as the control group. According to the statistical analysis in this study, the self-regulation scaffolding approach in G2 significantly promoted participants' AI skills and fostered their ability to regulate academic stress compared to the control group. However, G1 students who received concurrent online collaborative reflection did not demonstrate the expected effects of enhancing their learning compared with those (G2) who did not receive it. This study represents an early attempt to implement self-regulation scaffolding and online collaborative reflection integrated with chatbot in an online AI course. The results of this study could serve as a reference for online course designers, educators, and scholars planning to adopt these teaching methods, especially for those focusing on implementing online AI education and educational technologies (such as chatBot).
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 135 条
  • [41] New Methods to Support Effective Collaborative Reflection Among Kindergarten Teachers: An Action Research Approach
    Jiang, Yong
    Zheng, Chuchu
    [J]. EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION JOURNAL, 2021, 49 (02) : 247 - 258
  • [42] The state of cooperative learning in postsecondary and professional settings
    Johnson, David W.
    Johnson, Roger T.
    Smith, Karl
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2007, 19 (01) : 15 - 29
  • [43] Predictive power of regularity of pre-class activities in a flipped classroom
    Jovanovic, Jelena
    Mirriahi, Negin
    Gasevic, Dragan
    Dawson, Shane
    Pardo, Abelardo
    [J]. COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2019, 134 : 156 - 168
  • [44] Julie H, 2020, PROC FRONT EDUC CONF
  • [45] The characteristics of students, blog groups and blogging that predict reflection in blogs during teaching practice and induction year
    Kalk, Karmen
    Luik, Piret
    Taimalu, Merle
    [J]. TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION, 2019, 86
  • [46] Enabling the Creation of Intelligent Things: Bringing Artificial Intelligence and Robotics to Schools
    Kandlhofer, Martin
    Steinbauer, Gerald
    Lassnig, Julia P.
    Baumann, Wilfried
    Plomer, Sandra
    Ballagi, Aron
    Alfoldi, Istvan
    [J]. 2019 IEEE FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE (FIE 2019), 2019,
  • [47] Artificial Intelligence in Everyday Life 2.0: Educating University Students from Different Majors
    Kasinidou, Maria
    Kleanthous, Styliani
    Busso, Matteo
    Rodas, Marcelo
    Otterbacher, Jahna
    Giunchiglia, Fausto
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2024 CONFERENCE INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY IN COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION, VOL 1, ITICSE 2024, 2024, : 24 - 30
  • [48] Development of an AR-Based AI Education App for Non-Majors
    Kim, Jeongah
    Shim, Jaekwoun
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 : 14149 - 14156
  • [49] Analyzing Teacher Competency with TPACK for K-12 AI Education
    Kim, Seonghun
    Jang, Yeonju
    Choi, Seongyune
    Kim, Woojin
    Jung, Heeseok
    Kim, Soohwan
    Kim, Hyeoncheol
    [J]. KUNSTLICHE INTELLIGENZ, 2021, 35 (02): : 139 - 151
  • [50] Kunda M, 2021, Arxiv, DOI [arXiv:2110.09290, 10.48550/arXiv.2110.09290, DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.2110.09290]