Joint Physical Custody and Children's Physical and Mental Health

被引:0
作者
Riser, Quentin H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Inst Res Poverty, 4132 Nancy Nicholas Hall, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Human Ecol, 4132 Nancy Nicholas Hall, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
Joint Physical Custody; Divorce; Mental Health; Physical Health; Co-Parenting Quality; LIVING ARRANGEMENTS; NONRESIDENT FATHERS; PARENTAL CONFLICT; MARITAL CONFLICT; SOCIAL-SCIENCE; DIVORCE; ADJUSTMENT; ATTACHMENT; FAMILY; SEPARATION;
D O I
10.1007/s10566-025-09863-7
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
BackgroundThis study examines the effects of joint physical custody (JPC) on the physical and mental health of children following divorce, using comprehensive survey data from Wisconsin.ObjectiveInformed by Bronfenbrenner's Bioecological model, the study seeks to understand the impact of custody arrangements on children's health outcomes post-divorce. Prior research has suggested potential benefits of JPC, but there is a need for more robust analysis to control for selection biases and other confounding factors.MethodThe analytic sample is constructed to facilitate comparisons between mothers with shared versus sole placement. The parents in the Wisconsin data are included in the analytic sample based on survey measures reflecting the focal child's actual placement arrangement at the time of the survey. The final data include 374 parents consisting of 170 sole-placement mothers and 204 shared placement mothers. This study employs robust probit regression models and Inverse Probability Weighting (IPW) to account for selection biases. Descriptive statistics and multivariate models are used to analyze survey data collected from Wisconsin. The analytic approach ensures methodological rigor by adjusting for potential confounders and providing a more accurate estimate of the relationships under investigation.ResultsThe findings reveal that children in JPC arrangements exhibit significantly better mental health outcomes compared to those in sole custody. Specifically, 79.8% of children in JPC reported good mental health versus 67.9% in sole custody. Multivariate probit and IPW models corroborated these results. High-quality co-parenting relationships, more prevalent in JPC scenarios, were not clearly linked to these improved outcomes.ConclusionsThe study underscores the importance of nuanced policy approaches that consider individual family contexts and parental relationship quality. The findings raise questions concerning the need for interventions like co-parenting workshops to promote effective communication and collaboration between divorced parents. Further research is recommended to explore the long-term effects of custody arrangements on children's well-being and to inform evidence-based policy decisions. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of how JPC and co-parenting quality influence children's mental and physical health post-divorce.
引用
收藏
页数:31
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [1] BOWLBY-AINSWORTH ATTACHMENT THEORY
    AINSWORTH, MDS
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 1978, 1 (03) : 436 - 438
  • [2] Nonresident fathers and children's well-being: A meta-analysis
    Amato, PR
    Gilbreth, JG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND THE FAMILY, 1999, 61 (03): : 557 - 573
  • [3] Angrist JD, 2009, MOSTLY HARMLESS ECONOMETRICS: AN EMPIRICISTS COMPANION, P1
  • [4] Augustijn L., 2022, Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, V63, P401
  • [5] Joint physical custody and mothers' life satisfaction in Belgium, Finland, and Germany
    Augustijn, Lara
    Claessens, Elke
    Miettinen, Anneli
    Hakovirta, Mia
    Mortelmans, Dimitri
    Riser, Quentin H.
    Steinbach, Anja
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FAMILY STUDIES, 2025,
  • [6] Baude A., 2016, Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, V57, P338, DOI DOI 10.1080/10502556.2016.1185203
  • [7] Child adjustment in joint-custody versus sole-custody arrangements: A meta-analytic review
    Bauserman, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FAMILY PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 16 (01) : 91 - 102
  • [8] Bergstrm M., 2018, Journal of Epidemiology Community Health, V72, P653
  • [9] TOWARD THE DIFFERENTIATION OF HIGH-CONFLICT FAMILIES: AN ANALYSIS OF SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH AND CANADIAN CASE LAW
    Birnbaum, Rachel
    Bala, Nicholas
    [J]. FAMILY COURT REVIEW, 2010, 48 (03) : 403 - 416
  • [10] Fathers in attachment theory and research: a review
    Bretherton, Inge
    [J]. EARLY CHILD DEVELOPMENT AND CARE, 2010, 180 (1-2) : 9 - 23