Value of biomarkers in the prediction of shunt responsivity in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus

被引:0
作者
Miroslav Cihlo [1 ]
Pavel Trávníček [2 ]
Alena Tichá [1 ]
Radomír Hyšpler [2 ]
Marta Kalousová [3 ]
Svatopluk Řehák [3 ]
Karel Zadrobílek [4 ]
Lucie Kukrálová [1 ]
Pavel Póczoš [2 ]
Jan Pospíšil [1 ]
Pavel Dostál [2 ]
Vlasta Dostálová [5 ]
机构
[1] Charles University,Department of Neurosurgery
[2] Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove,Department of Neurosurgery
[3] University Hospital Hradec Kralove,Department of Clinical Biochemistry
[4] University Hospital Hradec Kralove,Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics
[5] First Faculty of Medicine,Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
[6] Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague,Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
[7] Charles University,undefined
[8] Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove,undefined
[9] University Hospital Hradec Kralove,undefined
关键词
Normal pressure hydrocephalus; Biomarkers; NfL; NfH; NSE; S100B; Tau protein; Beta-amyloid;
D O I
10.1007/s10143-025-03581-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Preoperative differentiation between responders and non-responders to ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunting in the treatment of normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) remains a significant challenge. Identifying biomarkers in presurgical assessment represents a promising approach to reducing the need for invasive cerebrospinal fluid CSF testing. In this prospective observational study, thirty adult patients were classified into Group A (responders to VP shunting) and Group B (non-responders) based on their responsiveness to invasive CSF testing. The overall clinical condition and Idiopathic NPH (iNPH) scale were assessed at baseline. Additionally, biomarker levels were compared between the two groups. Elevated levels of Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) and Neurofilament Heavy Chain (NfH) in CSF and a reduced level of beta-amyloid Aβ42 were observed. No significant differences in biomarker levels were found between groups. Individual biomarkers demonstrated only poor predictive value (AUC = 0.37–0.53). Clinical factors were stronger predictors (AUC = 0.642–0.669), with no improvement when combined with all examined biomarkers (AUC = 0.428–0.431). No single biomarker reliably predicted confirmed postoperative shunt responsiveness among patients who underwent VP shunt placement and demonstrated clinical improvement. Clinical factors were stronger predictors, suggesting that patient history and clinical assessment (e.g., the iNPH scale) provide more reliable diagnostic information. Notably, combining biomarkers with clinical factors did not improve predictive accuracy.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers and Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Perfect Duo?
    Fasano, Alfonso
    Tang-Wai, David F.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 45 (01) : 1 - 2
  • [22] How to Choose a Shunt for Patients with Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Short Guide to Selecting the Best Shunt Assembly
    Sahuquillo, Juan
    Rosas, Katiuska
    Calvo, Helena
    Alcina, Aloma
    Gandara, Dario
    Lopez-Bermeo, Diego
    Poca, Maria-Antonia
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (06) : 1 - 18
  • [23] Prediction of Shunt Responsiveness in Suspected Patients With Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Using the Lumbar Infusion Test: A Machine Learning Approach
    Mladek, Arnost
    Gerla, Vaclav
    Skalicky, Petr
    Vlasak, Ales
    Zazay, Awista
    Lhotska, Lenka
    Benes, Vladimir
    Benes, Vladimir
    Bradac, Ondrej
    NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 90 (04) : 407 - 418
  • [24] Association between ventricular CSF biomarkers and outcome after shunt surgery in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus
    Rebecca Grønning
    Anna Jeppsson
    Per Hellström
    Katarina Laurell
    Dan Farahmand
    Henrik Zetterberg
    Kaj Blennow
    Carsten Wikkelsø
    Mats Tullberg
    Fluids and Barriers of the CNS, 20
  • [25] Association between ventricular CSF biomarkers and outcome after shunt surgery in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus
    Gronning, Rebecca
    Jeppsson, Anna
    Hellstroem, Per
    Laurell, Katarina
    Farahmand, Dan
    Zetterberg, Henrik
    Blennow, Kaj
    Wikkelso, Carsten
    Tullberg, Mats
    FLUIDS AND BARRIERS OF THE CNS, 2023, 20 (01)
  • [26] The Prediction of Shunt Response in Idiopathic Normal-Pressure Hydrocephalus Based on Intracranial Pressure Monitoring and Lumbar Infusion
    Santamarta, David
    Gonzalez-Martinez, E.
    Fernandez, J.
    Mostaza, A.
    INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE AND BRAIN MONITORING XV, 2016, 122 : 267 - 274
  • [27] Impact of Comorbidities and Frailty on Early Shunt Failure in Geriatric Patients With Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
    Hadjiathanasiou, Alexis
    Kilinc, Fatma
    Behmanesh, Bedjan
    Bernstock, Joshua
    Gueresir, Erdem
    Heimann, Muriel
    Konczalla, Juergen
    Scharnboeck, Elisa
    Schneider, Matthias
    Weinhold, Leonie
    Seifert, Volker
    Vatter, Hartmut
    Gessler, Florian
    Schuss, Patrick
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2020, 7
  • [28] Analysis of hearing loss after shunt placement in patients with normal-pressure hydrocephalus
    van Veelen-Vincent, MLC
    Delwel, EJ
    Teeuw, R
    Kurt, E
    De Jong, DA
    Brocaar, MP
    Pauw, BKH
    Avezaat, CJJ
    van Zanten, BGA
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2001, 95 (03) : 432 - 434
  • [29] CLINICAL-PARAMETERS IN 74 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS SHUNT OPERATED FOR NORMAL PRESSURE HYDROCEPHALUS
    LARSSON, A
    WIKKELSO, C
    BILTING, M
    STEPHENSEN, H
    ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1991, 84 (06): : 475 - 482
  • [30] Prognostic value of amyloid PET scan in normal pressure hydrocephalus
    Jang, Hyemin
    Park, Seong Beom
    Kim, Yeshin
    Kim, Ko Woon
    Lee, Jung Il
    Kim, Sung Tae
    Lee, Kyung Han
    Kang, Eun-Suk
    Choe, Yeong Sim
    Seo, Sang Won
    Kim, Hee Jin
    Kim, Yeo Jin
    Yoon, Cindy W.
    Na, Duk L.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2018, 265 (01) : 63 - 73