The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment and Environmental Regulation on Urban Sustainable Competitiveness: Evidence from Chinese Cities

被引:0
作者
Luan, Shuochen [1 ]
Li, Jian [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ocean Univ China, Fac Econ, Qingdao 266100, Peoples R China
[2] Ocean Univ China, Inst Marine Dev, Qingdao 266100, Peoples R China
关键词
foreign direct investment; urban sustainable competitiveness; environmental regulation; inverted U-shaped relationship; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; FDI;
D O I
10.3390/su17083366
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Foreign direct investment (FDI), as a key driver of global factor mobility, significantly influences urban sustainable competitiveness (USC). This study investigates whether FDI can enhance USC amid potential environmental externalities and the moderating role of environmental regulation. Using panel data from 281 Chinese cities (2012-2020), we employ fixed-effects regression models with quadratic terms to capture the nonlinear relationship between FDI and USC. Our empirical analysis finds an inverted U-shaped relationship between FDI and USC, where FDI boosts USC up to a threshold beyond which its impact turns negative, aligning with the pollution haven hypothesis. Notably, environmental regulation moderates this relationship, with lax regulation enhancing FDI's positive effects more effectively than strict policies. Regionally, this threshold effect is pronounced in China's eastern cities but is less significant in the northeastern, central, and western regions due to limited FDI inflows. These findings offer essential insights for policymakers: implementing balanced environmental regulations can optimize FDI's contributions, encouraging high-quality, sustainable investment that strengthens USC.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   The effect of foreign direct investment on renewable energy consumption subject to the moderating effect of environmental regulation: Evidence from the BRICS countries [J].
Tan, Yan ;
Uprasen, Utai .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2022, 201 :135-149
[42]   The environmental impact of industrialization and foreign direct investment: empirical evidence from Asia-Pacific region [J].
Ahmed, Farhan ;
Ali, Imtiaz ;
Kousar, Shazia ;
Ahmed, Saira .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (20) :29778-29792
[43]   Impact of International Trade Cooperation and Distribution on Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from Vietnam [J].
Nguyen, Chi Dieu Thi .
JOURNAL OF DISTRIBUTION SCIENCE, 2022, 20 (04) :77-83
[44]   Crowds in or crowds out? The effect of foreign direct investment on domestic investment in Chinese cities [J].
Yao, Yao ;
Salim, Ruhul .
EMPIRICAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 58 (05) :2129-2154
[45]   The impact of Chinese foreign direct investment on host country economic growth [J].
Ross, Andrew G. ;
Fleming, Neil .
LOCAL ECONOMY, 2022, 37 (06) :507-525
[46]   Impact of Tax Incentives on Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from Africa [J].
Appiah-Kubi, Seth Nana Kwame ;
Malec, Karel ;
Phiri, Joseph ;
Maitah, Mansoor ;
Gebeltova, Zdenka ;
Smutka, Lubos ;
Blazek, Vojtech ;
Maitah, Kamil ;
Sirohi, Jitka .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (15)
[47]   Foreign direct investment and pollution emissions: a perspective from heterogeneous environmental regulation [J].
Fu, Lin ;
Long, Rui ;
Sun, Xiaohua ;
Wang, Yun .
MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2024, 35 (02) :378-401
[48]   The role of foreign direct investment in urban environmental management: Some evidence from Hanoi, Vietnam [J].
Nguyen T.B.M. ;
Nurul Amin A.T.M. .
Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2002, 4 (3) :279-297
[49]   Does foreign direct investment and environmental degradation matter for poverty? Evidence from developing countries [J].
Dhrifi, Abdelhafidh ;
Jaziri, Raouf ;
Alnahdi, Saleh .
STRUCTURAL CHANGE AND ECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2020, 52 :13-21
[50]   Environmental regulation and inward foreign direct investment: Evidence from the eleventh Five-Year Plan in China [J].
Li, Yanyun ;
Lin, Faqin ;
Wang, Wenxiao .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SURVEYS, 2022, 36 (03) :684-707