Walkability at Street Level: An Indicator-Based Assessment Model

被引:0
作者
Stutz, Petra [1 ]
Kaziyeva, Dana [1 ]
Traun, Christoph [1 ]
Werner, Christian [1 ]
Loidl, Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salzburg, Dept Geoinformat, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria
关键词
walkability; GIS; segment-based; open data; built environment; indicator-based; BUILT ENVIRONMENT; WALKING; HEALTH; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.3390/su17083634
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Walking is recognised as a healthy and sustainable mode of transport. Providing adequate infrastructure is pivotal for the promotion of walking and, subsequently, for achieving the benefits derived from its numerous positive effects. However, efficiently measuring the walkability at the street level remains challenging. In this paper, we present an indicator-based assessment model that can be used with open spatial data to evaluate segment-based walkability. The model incorporates eleven indicators describing the street segments and their close surroundings that are relevant for pedestrians, such as the presence and type of pedestrian infrastructure, road category, noise levels, and exposure to green and blue space. A weighted average calculation results in walkability index values for each street segment within a road network graph. The model's generic approach and the ability to be used with open data ensure its reproducibility, adaptability, and scalability. The feasibility of the walkability model was shown using a case study for Salzburg, Austria. The model's validity was evaluated through a large-scale study involving 660 full responses to an online survey. Participants provided ratings on the walkability of randomly selected street segments in Salzburg, which were compared with the calculated index, revealing a strong correlation (Spearman's rank correlation = 0.82).
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] To walk or not to walk? The hierarchy of walking needs
    Alfonzo, MA
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 2005, 37 (06) : 808 - 836
  • [2] Appolloni L., 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI [10.3390/su11123467, DOI 10.3390/su11123467]
  • [3] Global microscale walkability ratings and rankings: A novel composite indicator for 59 European city centres
    Bartzokas-Tsiompras, Alexandros
    Bakogiannis, Efthimios
    Nikitas, Alexandros
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2023, 111
  • [4] Bundesministerium fur Klimaschutz, Umwelt, Energie, Mobilitat, Innovation & Technologie Larmzonen Umgebungslarmkartierung 2017-Strasse Osterreich
  • [5] Place value: place quality and its impact on health, social, economic and environmental outcomes
    Carmona, Matthew
    [J]. JOURNAL OF URBAN DESIGN, 2019, 24 (01) : 1 - 48
  • [6] Walk Score™ As a Global Estimate of Neighborhood Walkability
    Carr, Lucas J.
    Dunsiger, Shira I.
    Marcus, Bess H.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2010, 39 (05) : 460 - 463
  • [7] Towards a multiple-scenario approach for walkability assessment: An empirical application in Shenzhen, China
    Chan, Eric T. H.
    Schwanen, Tim
    Banister, David
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2021, 71
  • [8] A GIS-based method for evaluating the walkability of a pedestrian environment and prioritised investments
    D'Orso, Gabriele
    Migliore, Marco
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 82
  • [9] Safe streets, livable streets
    Dumbaugh, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, 2005, 71 (03) : 283 - 298
  • [10] Connectivity and physical activity: using footpath networks to measure the walkability of built environments
    Ellis, Geraint
    Hunter, Ruth
    Tully, Mark A.
    Donnelly, Michael
    Kelleher, Luke
    Kee, Frank
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-PLANNING & DESIGN, 2016, 43 (01) : 130 - 151