AI based personalized learning in 'The Diamond Age': Artificial subversiveness and human feeling machines

被引:1
作者
Dishon, Gideon [1 ]
机构
[1] Bengur Univ Negev, Sch Educ, IL-8410501 Beer Sheva, Israel
基金
以色列科学基金会;
关键词
Artificial intelligence; personalized learning; postphenomenology; fiction; natural; TECHNOLOGY; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1080/00131857.2025.2494589
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This paper examines visions of AI-personalized learning through an analysis of Neal Stephenson's Science Fiction Novel 'The Diamond Age'. While contemporary discourse is often characterized by deterministic visions of AI-based personalization as a panacea to the homogenization and standardization of mass schooling, the novel presents a more nuanced view, both extending and problematizing such narratives. Namely, it portrays AI as key to cultivating subversive individuality that rises above existing social structures and norms. However, the novel also highlights how the impact of personalization depends on factors beyond the technology itself. Drawing on postphenomenological theory, I analyze the four different use cases of an AI-based educational device-The Young Lady's Illustrated Primer-presented in the novel: primer-as-education, primer-as-entertainment, primer-as-escape and primer-as-training. These four stabilities function as a conceptual roadmap for thinking about current models of AI-based personalization, distinguishing how the Primer's impact varies according to two factors: background experiences and human emotional connection. The combination of these two is needed for the emergence of composite human-technology intentionality, where AI is depicted as supporting users' capacity to become subversive-to shape their own aims. Despite this nuance, the novel's conceptualization of human-technology relations is nevertheless plagued by two problematic dichotomies, which are also prevalent in contemporary discourse: (i) between experiences on-and-off the screen, overlooking the more pervasive influence technology has on society and education; (ii) between cognitive and affective aspects of education, relegating decision-making to AI systems, thus paradoxically positioning humans as feeling machines.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Arnavas F, 2020, DICKENS AFTER DICKENS, P141, DOI 10.22599/DickensAfterDickens.h
[2]   A HISTORY OF TEACHING MACHINES [J].
BENJAMIN, LT .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1988, 43 (09) :703-712
[3]  
Boninger F., 2019, Personalized learning and the digital privatization of curriculum and teaching
[4]  
Brass J., 2020, Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, V35, P3
[5]   Personalized learning for every student every day [J].
Childress, Stacey ;
Benson, Scott .
PHI DELTA KAPPAN, 2014, 95 (08) :33-38
[6]   ChatGPT: deconstructing the debate and moving it forward [J].
Coeckelbergh, Mark ;
Gunkel, David J. .
AI & SOCIETY, 2024, 39 (05) :2221-2231
[7]   The Mobilisation of AI in Education: A Bourdieusean Field Analysis [J].
Davies, Huw C. ;
Eynon, Rebecca ;
Salveson, Cory .
SOCIOLOGY-THE JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH SOCIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 2021, 55 (03) :539-560
[8]   Explaining multistability: postphenomenology and affordances of technologies [J].
de Boer, Bas .
AI & SOCIETY, 2023, 38 (06) :2267-2277
[9]   The new natural? Authenticity and the naturalization of educational technologies [J].
Dishon, Gideon .
LEARNING MEDIA AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 46 (02) :156-173
[10]  
Dishon G, 2017, THEORY RES EDUC, V15, P272, DOI 10.1177/1477878517735233