Organizational-Level Training and Performance: A Meta-Analytic Investigation

被引:0
作者
Kim, Joonyoung [1 ]
Chang, Huikun [2 ]
Bell, Bradford S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Mississippi, Columbia, MO USA
[2] Hanyang Univ, ERICA, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Cornell Univ, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
关键词
human capital theory; meta-analysis; organizational-level training; organizational performance; HUMAN-RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; FILE-DRAWER PROBLEM; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; FIRM PERFORMANCE; COMPREHENSIVE MODEL; BOUNDARY-CONDITIONS; LABOR PRODUCTIVITY; EMPLOYEE OUTCOMES; HIGH-TECHNOLOGY; WORK SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1177/01492063251327588; 10.1177/01492063251327588
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
While extensive research has examined the relationship between human resource management systems and organizational performance, the impact of organizational-level training-defined as the quantity and quality of training that an organization provides to its employees-remains less understood. In this article, we conducted a meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational-level training and organizational performance to determine the magnitude of the relationship and test a set of moderators of the relationship. Grounded in human capital theory, our meta-analysis employs a theoretically driven moderator analysis to identify the conditions under which organizational-level training significantly influences organizational performance. The results from 159 studies (N = 75,033) show that the relationship between organizationallevel training and organizational performance is positive and significant (rho =.13, SD rho =.17, 95% CI [.11, .16]). More importantly, the effect size differs significantly across several theoretical (e.g., training dimensions, type of human capital, outcome dimensions, and timing of measurement) and contextual (e.g., industry knowledge intensity, firm age, and region) moderators. Implications of these findings and directions for future research are discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:38
相关论文
共 134 条
[1]   Meta-Analytic Choices and Judgment Calls: Implications for Theory Building and Testing, Obtained Effect Sizes, and Scholarly Impact [J].
Aguinis, Herman ;
Dalton, Dan R. ;
Bosco, Frank A. ;
Pierce, Charles A. ;
Dalton, Catherine M. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2011, 37 (01) :5-38
[2]   Benefits of Training and Development for Individuals and Teams, Organizations, and Society [J].
Aguinis, Herman ;
Kraiger, Kurt .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 60 :451-474
[3]   A Cross-National Meta-Analytic Examination of Predictors and Outcomes Associated With Work-Family Conflict [J].
Allen, Tammy D. ;
French, Kimberly A. ;
Dumani, Soner ;
Shockley, Kristen M. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 105 (06) :539-576
[4]   How entrepreneurial firms can benefit from alliances with large partners [J].
Alvarez, SA ;
Barney, JB .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT EXECUTIVE, 2001, 15 (01) :139-148
[5]  
Alvesson Mats., 2004, KNOWLEDGE WORK KNOWL
[6]   HRM and organizational performance in northern and southern Europe [J].
Apospori, Eleni ;
Nikandrou, Irene ;
Brewster, Chris ;
Papalexandris, Nancy .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2008, 19 (07) :1187-1207
[7]  
Association for Talent Development, 2022, State of the industry report
[8]   Predicting the Big 5 personality traits from digital footprints on social media: A meta-analysis [J].
Azucar, Danny ;
Marengo, Davide ;
Settanni, Michele .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2018, 124 :150-159
[9]   Technology-based, "adolescent" firm configurations: Strategy identification, context, and performance [J].
Bantel, KA .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 1998, 13 (03) :205-230
[10]   FIRM RESOURCES AND SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
BARNEY, J .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1991, 17 (01) :99-120