Technological diversification and resilience to systematic risk: Evidence from listed firms in China

被引:1
作者
Mo, Jiaying [1 ]
Kong, Dongmin [2 ]
Rong, Zhao [3 ]
Yu, Li [4 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ Sci & Technol, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[3] Zhongnan Univ Econ & Law, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Manitoba, Asper Sch Business, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Technological diversification; Systematic risk contagion; Left-tail correlation; China; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS; MARKET VOLATILITY; CREDIT RISK; CRASH RISK; INNOVATION; PERSPECTIVE; PERFORMANCE; SPILLOVERS; RETURNS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.iref.2025.104034
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper investigates whether a firm with diversified technological bases is more resilient to systematic downside risk. By investigating Chinese listed manufacturing firms for 2015-2023, we find that diversified technological bases significantly reduce the left-tail correlation between its stock return and the market return, suggesting that the more diversified technology bases, the less likely systematic downside risk would negatively influence its stock price. Compared to stateowned enterprises (SOEs) or firms in traditional industries, the technological diversification effect is more pronounced among non-SOEs or firms in high-tech industries. Further analysis suggests that by improving production efficiency and enhancing market power, a firm with a diversified technological base transmits a capacity signal to investors and thus enhances its resilience to systematic risk. By exploiting the 2018 U.S. tariff increase as a negative exogenous shock, we find that exporting firms in targeted industries, relative to those in nontargeted industries, had greater resilience to systematic risk after the shock when their technological bases were more diversified. Overall, this paper confirms the signaling role of technological diversification in the financial market and advances the understanding of firms' ability to resist systematic downside risk.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   Related and unrelated variety as regional drivers of enterprise productivity and innovation: A multilevel study [J].
Aarstad, Jarle ;
Kvitastein, Olav A. ;
Jakobsen, Stig-Erik .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2016, 45 (04) :844-856
[2]   Liquidity, Liquidity Everywhere, Not a Drop to Use: Why Flooding Banks with Central Bank Reserves May Not Expand Liquidity [J].
Acharya, Viral V. ;
Rajan, Raghuram .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2024, 79 (05) :2943-2991
[3]   Does the stock market reward innovation? European stock index reaction to negative news during the global financial crisis [J].
Adcock, Christopher ;
Hua, Xiuping ;
Mazouz, Khelifa ;
Yin, Shuxing .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MONEY AND FINANCE, 2014, 49 :470-491
[4]   KNOWLEDGE SPILLOVERS, INNOVATION AND GROWTH [J].
Aghion, Philippe ;
Jaravel, Xavier .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2015, 125 (583) :533-545
[5]   Debt holdings and investment cash flow sensitivity of listed firms [J].
Ahiadorme, Johnson Worlanyo ;
Gyeke-Dako, Agyapomaa ;
Abor, Joshua Yindenaba .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGING MARKETS, 2018, 13 (05) :943-958
[6]   Being famous matters: Evidence from cash flow volatility [J].
Ahmed, Mohamed Shaker ;
Elnahass, Marwa .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 93
[7]   Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Risk: Theory and Empirical Evidence [J].
Albuquerque, Rui ;
Koskinen, Yrjo ;
Zhang, Chendi .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2019, 65 (10) :4451-4469
[8]   Firm's resilience to supply chain disruptions: Scale development and empirical examination [J].
Ambulkar, Saurabh ;
Blackhurst, Jennifer ;
Grawe, Scott .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2015, 33-34 :111-122
[9]   Firm crash risk, information environment, and speed of leverage adjustment [J].
An, Zhe ;
Li, Donghui ;
Yu, Jin .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2015, 31 :132-151
[10]   Patent portfolio diversity and firm profitability: A question of specialization or diversification? [J].
Appio, Francesco P. ;
De Luca, Luigi M. ;
Morgan, Robert ;
Martini, Antonella .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2019, 101 :255-267