Geospatial and multi-criteria decision analysis for sustainable solid waste disposal site selection in Debre Tabor, Ethiopia

被引:0
作者
Mulualem, Biksegn [1 ]
Ayenew, Tenalem [2 ]
Tesfaw, Gashaw [1 ]
Jothimani, Muralitharan [3 ]
Mulualem, Wuletaw [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gondar, Coll Nat & Computat Sci, Dept Geol, Gondar, Ethiopia
[2] Addis Ababa Univ, Sch Earth Sci, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
[3] Arba Minch Univ, Coll Nat & Computat Sci, Dept Geol, Arba Minch, Ethiopia
来源
DISCOVER SUSTAINABILITY | 2025年 / 6卷 / 01期
关键词
AHP; Debre Tabor; Ethiopia; GIS; Solid waste disposal site selection; LANDFILL SITE; COMBINING GIS; AHP; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s43621-025-01365-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Rapid urbanization and population growth in Debre Tabor, Ethiopia, have intensified solid waste management challenges, leading to environmental and health risks due to improper disposal practices. This study utilizes Geographic Information Systems (GIS), Remote Sensing (RS), and the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to identify suitable landfill sites in the region. ArcGIS 10.8 and ERDAS Imagine 2015 were used for spatial analysis and land-use classification, respectively. Seven key criteria were considered: proximity to roads, water bodies, and residential areas, land-use/land-cover, soil type, lithology, and slope. AHP was employed to determine criteria weights, and a Weighted Linear Combination (WLC) method integrated these factors into a suitability map. The results indicate that 6.8% (294.4 ha) of the study area is highly suitable, 15.7% (675.3 ha) is moderately suitable, 14.2% (610.1 ha) is suitable, and 63.3% (2720.2 ha) is unsuitable for landfill development. Highly suitable areas were found to be strategically distanced from environmentally sensitive and urban zones, featuring stable geological conditions and accessible road networks. The study highlights the effectiveness of GIS and AHP integration in sustainable landfill site selection and urban waste management planning. However, field validation gaps were observed due to logistical constraints, indicating the need for further on-site assessment to strengthen model reliability. The proposed methodology provides a replicable framework for other urban centers facing similar waste disposal challenges while addressing environmental, social, and economic concerns.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
Abbate E., 2015, LANDSCAPES LANDFORMS, P33, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-8026-1_2, 10.1007/978-94-017-8026-12, DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-8026-12]
[2]   COMBINING GIS, FUZZY LOGIC, AND AHP MODELS FOR SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL SITE SELECTION IN NASIRIYAH, IRAQ [J].
Abdulhasan, M. J. ;
Hanafiah, M. M. ;
Satchet, M. S. ;
Abdulaali, H. S. ;
Toriman, M. E. ;
Al-Raad, A. A. .
APPLIED ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2019, 17 (03) :6701-6722
[3]   Groundwater chemistry affected by trace elements (As, Mo, Ni, U and V) from a burning alum shale waste deposit, Kvarntorp, Sweden [J].
Ahlgren, Kristina ;
Sjoberg, Viktor ;
Allard, Bert ;
Backstrom, Mattias .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (23) :30219-30241
[4]   Combining multicriteria decision analysis with GIS for suitably siting landfills in a Nigerian state [J].
Ajibade, Fidelis O. ;
Olajire, Olabanji O. ;
Ajibade, Temitope F. ;
Nwogwu, Nathaniel A. ;
Lasisi, Kayode H. ;
Alo, Ayopo B. ;
Owolabi, Titilayo A. ;
Adewumi, James R. .
ENVIRONMENTAL AND SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS, 2019, 3-4
[5]  
Aklilu T., 2021, Technium Soc Sci J, V16, P11
[6]  
Ali A., 2018, Int J Waste Resour, V8, P2
[7]  
Aljanabi F., 2024, J Eng Sustain Dev, DOI [10.31272/jeasd.28.4.4, DOI 10.31272/JEASD.28.4.4]
[8]  
Asefa B., 2019, Am J Environ Prot, V7, P17, DOI [10.12691/ENV-7-1-4, DOI 10.12691/ENV-7-1-4]
[9]   Identifying and Ranking Landfill Sites for Municipal Solid Waste Management: An Integrated Remote Sensing and GIS Approach [J].
Aslam, Bilal ;
Maqsoom, Ahsen ;
Tahir, Muhammad Dawar ;
Ullah, Fahim ;
Rehman, Muhammad Sami Ur ;
Albattah, Mohammed .
BUILDINGS, 2022, 12 (05)
[10]  
Assefa M., 2017, International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy, V5, P84, DOI DOI 10.11648/J.IJEPP.20170506.11