Machine Learning-Based Prediction of No-Show Telemedicine Encounters

被引:0
作者
Reategui-Rivera, C. Mahony [1 ]
Cui, Wanting [1 ]
Escobar-Agreda, Stefan [2 ]
Rojas-Mezarina, Leonardo [2 ]
Finkelstein, Joseph [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Dept Biomed Informat, 421 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108 USA
[2] Univ Nacl Mayor San Marcos, Sch Med, Telehlth Unit, Lima, Peru
来源
TELEMEDICINE REPORTS | 2025年 / 6卷 / 01期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
artificial intelligence; machine learning; no-show; Peru; prediction; telehealth; telemedicine; COST;
D O I
10.1089/tmr.2025.0009
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of machine learning (ML) models in predicting patient no-shows for telemedicine appointments within Peruvian health system and identify key predictors of nonattendance.Methods: We performed a retrospective observational study using anonymized data (June 2019-November 2023) from "Teleatiendo." The dataset included over 1.5 million completed appointments and about 64,000 no-shows (4.1%), focusing on teleorientation and telemonitoring. Predictor variables included patient demographics, socioeconomic factors, health care facility characteristics, appointment timing, and telemedicine service types. A 70% training, 10% validation, and 20% testing split were used over 10 iterations, with hyperparameter tuning performed on the validation set to identify optimal model parameters. Multiple ML approaches-random forest, XGBoost, LightGBM, and anomaly detection-were implemented in combination with undersampling and cost-sensitive learning to address class imbalance. Performance was evaluated using precision, recall, specificity, area under the curve (AUC), F1-score, and accuracy.Results: Of the models tested, undersampling with XGBoost achieved a precision of 0.115 (+/- 0.001), recall of 0.654 (+/- 0.005), specificity of 0.786 (+/- 0.002), AUC of 0.720 (+/- 0.002), and accuracy of 0.780 (+/- 0.002). In contrast, cost-sensitive XGBoost exhibited a balanced performance with a precision of 0.123 (+/- 0.001), recall of 0.639 (+/- 0.006), specificity of 0.805 (+/- 0.004), AUC of 0.722 (+/- 0.001), and accuracy of 0.799 (+/- 0.003). Additionally, cost-sensitive random forest achieved the highest specificity (0.843 +/- 0.002) and accuracy (0.832 +/- 0.001) but recorded a lower recall (0.585 +/- 0.004), while cost-sensitive LightGBM and balanced random forest yielded performance metrics similar to cost-sensitive XGBoost. Isolation forest, used for abnormality detection, demonstrated the lowest performance.Conclusions: ML models can moderately predict telemedicine no-shows in Peru, with cost-sensitive boosting techniques enhancing the identification of high-risk patients. Key predictors reflect both individual behavior and system-level contexts, suggesting the need for tailored, context-specific interventions. These findings can inform targeted strategies to optimize telemedicine, improve appointment adherence, and promote equitable health care access.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 119
页数:11
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Transition to telemedicine and its impact on missed appointments in community-based clinics
    Adepoju, Omolola E.
    Chae, Minji
    Liaw, Winston
    Angelocci, Tracy
    Millard, Paul
    Matuk-Villazon, Omar
    [J]. ANNALS OF MEDICINE, 2022, 54 (01) : 98 - 107
  • [2] Alshammari R, 2020, INT J ADV COMPUT SC, V11, P533
  • [3] Closing the gap: addressing telehealth disparities across specialties in the sustained pandemic era
    Amagai, Saki
    Vonesh, Edward
    Adams, James
    Luo, Yuan
    [J]. NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE, 2024, 7 (01):
  • [4] Estimating the Cost of No-Shows and Evaluating the Effects of Mitigation Strategies
    Berg, Bjorn P.
    Murr, Michael
    Chermak, David
    Woodall, Jonathan
    Pignone, Michael
    Sandler, Robert S.
    Denton, Brian T.
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2013, 33 (08) : 976 - 985
  • [5] Association Between Telehealth and Missed Appointments Among Patients Experiencing Behavioral Health Challenges
    Bhatta, Dependra
    Sizer, Monteic A.
    Acharya, Binod
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2023, 6 (07)
  • [6] Sociodemographic factors affecting telemedicine access: A population-based analysis
    Chagpar, Anees B.
    [J]. SURGERY, 2022, 171 (03) : 793 - 798
  • [7] Cui Wanting, 2022, Stud Health Technol Inform, V295, P328, DOI 10.3233/SHTI220729
  • [8] No-shows in appointment scheduling - a systematic literature review
    Dantas, Leila F.
    Fleck, Julia L.
    Cyrino Oliveira, Fernando L.
    Hamacher, Silvio
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY, 2018, 122 (04) : 412 - 421
  • [9] Daz-Vlez C., 2020, Rev Mdica Inst Mex Seguro Soc, V57, P307
  • [10] Identifying Facilitators and Barriers to Implementation of AI-Assisted Clinical Decision Support in an Electronic Health Record System
    Finkelstein, Joseph
    Gabriel, Aileen
    Schmer, Susanna
    Truong, Tuyet-Trinh
    Dunn, Andrew
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SYSTEMS, 2024, 48 (01)