Exploratory factor analysis of the post-traumatic growth inventory among individuals in recovery from addiction

被引:0
作者
Chambers, Sophia [1 ]
Toner, Paul [2 ]
Brignell, Catherine [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Sch Psychol, Southampton, England
[2] Univ Dundee, Sch Hlth Sci, Dundee DD1 4HJ, Scotland
关键词
Posttraumatic growth; recovery; addiction; validity; factor analysis; psychometrics; CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; CHANGE FOLLOWING TRAUMA; MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALE; SOCIAL SUPPORT; INVARIANCE; ALCOHOL; DEPENDENCE; ADVERSITY; SAMPLE;
D O I
10.1080/16066359.2025.2475294
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThe Post-Traumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI) is a widely used measure of psychological growth following adversity, although not yet validated for use with those in recovery from substance addiction. The present study was designed to explore the latent structure, reliability, and validity of the inventory in this new population.MethodThe PTGI was completed by 485 adults (71.8% female) in recovery from addiction. Exploratory Factor Analysis, supported by parallel analysis, was used to explore the latent structure of the PTGI. Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficients and item-total correlations were calculated to assess internal reliability of the PTGI. Concurrent and convergent validity were also examined by the relationship between the PTGI and measures of growth, social support and rumination.ResultsAnalysis supported a two-factor structure including 18-items, explaining 60.28% of the common variance. The two subscales appeared to capture 1) intrapersonal growth and 2) interpersonal growth (including relationship with God). A strong positive correlation between the subscales in the two-factor solution, and the presence of a single-factor solution explaining 52.31% of the variance, also suggest the presence of a single latent 'growth' construct. All scales demonstrated excellent reliability, and concurrent and convergent validity.ConclusionsThis study supports the reliability and validity of the PTGI for use with those in addiction recovery. Evidence suggests psychological growth in this population can be experienced intra- and inter-personally, but likely has an underlying core.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [1] Airdrie S., 2017, Evaluation of measurement properties of posttraumatic growth questionnaires in physical health and predictors of posttraumatic growth post lung transplant Doctor of Clinical Psychology
  • [2] A meta-analysis of the association between event-related rumination and posttraumatic growth: The Event-Related Rumination Inventory and the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory
    Allen, Niamh
    Hevey, David
    Cogley, Clodagh
    O'Keeffe, Fiadhnait
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMATIC STRESS, 2022, 35 (06) : 1575 - 1585
  • [3] Measuring growth with the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory
    Anderson, Walter P., Jr.
    Lopez-Baez, Sandra I.
    [J]. MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION IN COUNSELING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2008, 40 (04) : 215 - 227
  • [4] Implementing routine outcome monitoring in clinical practice: Benefits, challenges, and solutions
    Boswell, James F.
    Kraus, David R.
    Miller, Scott D.
    Lambert, Michael J.
    [J]. PSYCHOTHERAPY RESEARCH, 2015, 25 (01) : 6 - 19
  • [5] The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory: an examination of the factor structure and invariance among breast cancer survivors
    Brunet, Jennifer
    McDonough, Meghan H.
    Hadd, Valerie
    Crocker, Peter R. E.
    Sabiston, Catherine M.
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2010, 19 (08) : 830 - 838
  • [6] Calhoun LG, 1998, LEA SER PER CLIN PSY, P215
  • [7] Assessing posttraumatic cognitive processes: the Event Related Rumination Inventory
    Cann, Arnie
    Calhoun, Lawrence G.
    Tedeschi, Richard G.
    Triplett, Kelli N.
    Vishnevsky, Tanya
    Lindstrom, Cassie M.
    [J]. ANXIETY STRESS AND COPING, 2011, 24 (02) : 137 - 156
  • [8] Cohen J., 2013, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA, DOI [DOI 10.4324/9780203771587, 10.4324/9780203771587]
  • [9] Comrey A. L., 1992, A first course in factor analysis, V2nd ed., DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315827506
  • [10] Costello A. B., 2019, Practical Assessment, Research Evaluation, V10, P7, DOI DOI 10.7275/JYJ1-4868