From printing to performance: a review on 3D concrete printing processes, materials, and life cycle assessment

被引:0
作者
Sanjeet Kumar Mishra [1 ]
K. Snehal [2 ]
B. B. Das [3 ]
Rajasekaran Chandrasekaran [3 ]
Salim Barbhuiya [4 ]
机构
[1] Sustainable Construction and Building Materials Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Karnataka, Karnataka, Surathkal
[2] Department of Civil Engineering, Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh, Prayagraj
[3] Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Karnataka, Karnataka, Surathkal
[4] Department of Engineering and Construction, University of East London, University Way, London
关键词
3D concrete printing; Life cycle analysis; Material selection; Mix design; Printing parameters; Rheology;
D O I
10.1007/s41024-025-00626-4
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A paradigm shift in the construction sector has been driven by 3D concrete printing (3DCP), offering automated alternatives to conventional building methods. 3DCP enhances precision, efficiency, and consistency through robotic control and advanced printhead systems while reducing material waste and enabling design flexibility. This review examines the working principles, printer classifications (gantry-based and robotic arm-based), and operational parameters, highlighting printing speed, interlayer gap time, and nozzle size and shape as critical parameters for buildability, interlayer bonding, and extrusion quality. Their influence is discussed in relation to fresh properties (flowability, pumpability, extrudability, shape retention, and buildability) and hardened properties (compressive, tensile, and flexural strength, interlayer bonding, and durability). Mix design strategies for optimizing rheology, printability, and sustainable material selection are critically reviewed. Key durability concerns such as shrinkage, cracking, and weather resistance are addressed. Reinforcement methods, including steel bars, fibers, and embedment techniques, are also discussed. A life cycle analysis reveals that 3DCP reduces carbon dioxide emissions by up to 89.2% and construction costs by 30–40% through formwork elimination. Environmental impacts (waste generation, carbon footprint, and energy use) are assessed using regional and global data, considering embodied energy, transportation, and maintenance costs. Challenges such as regulatory hurdles, high initial investment, and the absence of standardized guidelines are identified. This review covers developments from the past decade, offering valuable insights for researchers, industry professionals, and policymakers regarding the advancements, limitations, and future directions of 3DCP. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2025.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 194 条
[1]  
Suntharalingam T., Nagaratnam B., Poologanathan K., Et al., Evolution of additive manufacturing technology in construction industry & challenges on implementation: A review, 10Th Int Conf Struct Eng Constr Manag, (2019)
[2]  
Allouzi R., Al A.W., Allouzi R., Conventional Construction and 3D Printing: A Comparison Study on Material Cost in Jordan, J Eng (United Kingdom), 2020, (2020)
[3]  
Tay Y.W.D., Panda B., Paul S.C., Et al., 3D printing trends in building and construction industry: a review, Virtual Phys Prototyp, 12, pp. 261-276, (2017)
[4]  
Agusti-Juan I., Muller F., Hack N., Et al., Potential benefits of digital fabrication for complex structures: environmental assessment of a robotically fabricated concrete wall, J Clean Prod, 154, pp. 330-340, (2017)
[5]  
Mobile concrete batching plant
[6]  
Ultratech Ready Mixed Concrete, (2025)
[7]  
Builders Constructors Workers Building Houses Clipart, (2025)
[8]  
Formwork construction
[9]  
(2024)
[10]  
3D-printed villa of Godrej Properties constructed by Tvasta, (2025)