R&D performance evaluation and analysis under uncertainty: the case of Chinese industrial enterprises

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Jiang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhu, Chen [4 ]
Goh, Mark [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Wuxi Univ, Sch Digital Econ & Management, Wuxi 214105, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, NUS Business Sch, Singapore 119613, Singapore
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Logist Inst Asia Pacific, Singapore 119613, Singapore
[4] HEC Montreal, GERAD, 3000,Ch Cote St Catherine, Montreal, PQ H3T 2A7, Canada
关键词
data envelopment analysis; R&D performance; performance evaluation; industrial industry; robust optimization; ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; INNOVATION EFFICIENCY; DEA; TECHNOLOGY; MODELS;
D O I
10.1093/reseval/rvaf012
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is a widely adopted non-parametric technique for evaluating R&D performance. However, traditional DEA models often struggle to provide reliable solutions in the presence of data uncertainty. To address this limitation, this study develops a novel robust super-efficiency DEA approach to evaluate R&D performance under uncertain conditions. Using this approach, we analyze the R&D performance of industrial enterprises across 30 Chinese provincial regions from 2018 to 2022. The empirical results reveal a notable decline in R&D performance during 2018-20, driven by external shocks such as trade conflicts and the pandemic, followed by a gradual recovery post-2020, a trend that remains consistent under varying levels of data perturbation. Regional analysis highlights substantial disparities in R&D performance across Chinese regions. Comparative analysis further demonstrates the proposed model's advantages in feasibility and computational efficiency. Based on the empirical analysis, we provide several policy implications. While rooted in the Chinese context, this paper contributes both methodologically through its robust DEA framework for handling uncertainty, and empirically by offering valuable insights into improving R&D performance in diverse national and organizational settings.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Industrial performance of the top R&D enterprises in world-leading economies: A metafrontier approach
    Aristovnik, Aleksander
    Yang, Guo-liang
    Song, Yao-yao
    Ravselj, Dejan
    SOCIO-ECONOMIC PLANNING SCIENCES, 2023, 89
  • [2] R&D investment under stress and uncertainty: the case of Argentina
    Arza, Valeria
    Nieri, Federica
    Giuliani, Elisa
    INNOVATION AND DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 13 (03) : 441 - 469
  • [3] The Performance Evaluation of Pharmaceutical Enterprises' R&D Team Based on ANP
    Zhang, Mo
    Wang, Xiaoli
    Mao, Tiezheng
    Cheng, Cheng
    LISS 2014, 2015, : 837 - 841
  • [4] Study on Performance Evaluation System of R&D Team of New Energy Enterprises
    Du, Lifu
    Wu, Jianlong
    ADVANCES IN ENERGY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, PTS 1-4, 2013, 291-294 : 1231 - +
  • [5] R&D internationalization, product diversification and international performance for emerging market enterprises: An empirical study on Chinese enterprises
    Tang, Chunhui
    Tang, Yaojia
    Su, Shengwei
    EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2019, 37 (04) : 529 - 539
  • [6] Performance evaluation of R&D organisations: an Asian perspective
    Sinimole, K. R.
    Saini, Kanti Mohan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE ECONOMICS OF BUSINESS, 2021, 28 (02) : 179 - 196
  • [7] Structuring innovation funnels for R&D projects under uncertainty
    Wang, Juite
    R & D MANAGEMENT, 2017, 47 (01) : 127 - 140
  • [8] Performance evaluation of R&D active firms
    Khoshnevis, Pegah
    Teirlinck, Peter
    SOCIO-ECONOMIC PLANNING SCIENCES, 2018, 61 : 16 - 28
  • [9] R&D Project Performance Evaluation With Multiple and Interdependent Criteria
    Tohumcu, Zeynep
    Karasakal, Esra
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2010, 57 (04) : 620 - 633
  • [10] Team Communications and Academic R&D Performance: A Case of National Telecommunication Program of Taiwan
    Hung, C. L.
    Chou, J. C.
    Kuo, S. J.
    2011 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEM), 2011, : 879 - 883