The processing of scalar implicature for native speakers and advanced-level learners of Chinese as a second language: an ERP study

被引:0
作者
Zhang, Jinqiao [1 ]
Zhang, Qiaohong [1 ]
Xu, Guiping [1 ]
Ma, Yunxiao [1 ,2 ]
Li, You [1 ]
Yu, Keke [2 ]
Zhang, Fen [3 ]
机构
[1] Jinan Univ, Inst Appl Linguist, Coll Chinese Language & Culture, Guangzhou 510610, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] South China Normal Univ, Sch Psychol, Guangzhou 510631, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Flemish Inst Technol Res VITO, VITO Hlth, Mol, Belgium
关键词
Chinese native speakers; Advanced-level CSL learners; Scalar implicature; ERP; P200; N400; TIME-COURSE; CHILDREN; COMPREHENSION; ACQUISITION; DISJUNCTION; ADULTS; SPEED;
D O I
10.1007/s12144-025-07775-2
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The generation and derivation of scalar implicature have always been a focal point in semantics and pragmatics. In an event-related potentials (ERPs) study, we investigated the comprehension of scalar implicature in Chinese using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation paradigm and semantic judgment task. And 26 native Chinese speakers and 28 advanced-level learners of Chinese as a second language (CSL) were presented with two utterance types including underinformative sentences (e.g., Some tigers have tails) and patently true sentences (e.g., Some animals have tails). Each stimulus type consisted of 45 sentences. The behavioral data revealed that the selection rate of scalar implicature is better than logical meaning, and remarkably higher in patently true sentences than in underinformative sentences. We also observed that native speakers have a significantly higher selection rate for scalar implicature than advanced-level CSL learners. There was no significant difference among meaning types, utterance types and participant types. The ERP results indicated that P200 amplitude in underinformative utterances was higher compared to patently true utterances. There was a significant interaction between utterance types and participant types. The post-hoc analysis showed that advanced CSL learners had higher P200 amplitudes than native speakers in the patently true utterance condition, but there was no significant difference in P200 amplitudes between the two participant types under the non-informative utterance condition. Comparing two of the utterance types, the P200 amplitude in the underinformative utterance condition was higher than in patently true utterances for native speakers, whereas no such difference in advanced-level CSL learners. We also found that utterances with insufficient information induced a steeper N400 than utterances that were patently true utterances.
引用
收藏
页码:9887 / 9898
页数:12
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   NEGATIVES IN CONTEXT [J].
ARROYO, FV .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1982, 21 (01) :118-126
[2]   Gricean Expectations in Online Sentence Comprehension: An ERP Study on the Processing of Scalar Inferences [J].
Augurzky, Petra ;
Franke, Michael ;
Ulrich, Rolf .
COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2019, 43 (08)
[3]  
Bezuidenhout A. L., 2004, EXPT PRAGMATICS, DOI [10.1057/978023052412512, DOI 10.1057/978023052412512]
[4]   Some utterances are underinformative: The onset and time course of scalar inferences [J].
Bott, L ;
Noveck, IA .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2004, 51 (03) :437-457
[5]   Distinguishing speed from accuracy in scalar implicatures [J].
Bott, Lewis ;
Bailey, Todd M. ;
Grodner, Daniel .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2012, 66 (01) :123-142
[6]   DEVELOPMENT OF COMPREHENSION OF OR - EVIDENCE FOR A SEQUENCE OF COMPETENCIES [J].
BRAINE, MDS ;
RUMAIN, B .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 1981, 31 (01) :46-70
[7]   Investigating the timecourse of accessing conversational implicatures during incremental sentence interpretation [J].
Breheny, Richard ;
Ferguson, Heather J. ;
Katsos, Napoleon .
LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES, 2013, 28 (04) :443-467
[8]  
Carston Robyn., 1998, RELEVANCE THEORY, P179, DOI [DOI 10.1075/PBNS.37.11CAR, 10.1075/pbns.37.11car]
[9]  
[陈广耀 Chen Guangyao], 2014, [心理学报, Acta Psychologica Sinica], V46, P204
[10]  
Chen S., 2018, J PLA U FOREIGN LANG, V1, P81