Does digital transformation affect systemic risk? Evidence from the banking sector in China

被引:1
作者
Li, Yawen [1 ]
Xia, Yufei [1 ]
Sun, Zongting [2 ]
Sun, Naili [1 ]
机构
[1] Jiangsu Normal Univ, Business Sch, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Financial Regulatory Adm, Xuzhou Branch, Xuzhou 221111, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Digital transformation; Commercial bank; Systemic risk; Bank behavior; CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS; FINANCIAL STABILITY; LIQUIDITY RISK; COMPETITION; IMPACT; PROFITABILITY; INFORMATION; SRISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104137
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Digital transformation (DT) has reshaped the banking industry's competition patterns and operational approaches and introduced new challenges and risks to banks. This study examines the effect of DT on systemic risk. Using panel data from 2011Q1 to 2021Q4, we empirically confirm that commercial banks' DT promotion can significantly mitigate systemic risk. A 1 % increase in the standard deviation of DT can result in a maximum 8.54 % decrease in the mean banks' systemic risk. Furthermore, DT reduces banks' systemic risk by increasing bank concentration, enhancing business diversification, optimizing cost control, and reducing charter value. We further determine the negative moderating effect of economic policy uncertainty on the DT-systemic risk nexus. The impacts of DT on commercial banks' systemic risk exhibit some heterogeneity based on different DT dimensions, systemically (un)important banks, and bank size. Our main conclusions remain robust after addressing potential endogeneity and employing alternative dependent variables, sample periods, and clustered standard errors. We also analyze the effects of DT on banks' future practices by reducing systemic risk. As DT advances, mitigating systemic risk in banks results in lower earnings and higher risk-taking in the next period. Finally, we propose some implications for banks and regulators.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 158 条
[51]   The network and own effects of global-systemically-important-bank designations [J].
Egger, Peter H. ;
Li, Jie ;
Zhu, Jiaqing .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MONEY AND FINANCE, 2023, 136
[52]   Systemic Risk in Europe* [J].
Engle, Robert ;
Jondeau, Eric ;
Rockinger, Michael .
REVIEW OF FINANCE, 2015, 19 (01) :145-190
[53]   Managing digital transformation: The view from the top [J].
Fernandez-Vidal, Jorge ;
Perotti, Francesco Antonio ;
Gonzalez, Reyes ;
Gasco, Jose .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2022, 152 :29-41
[54]   Bank competition and financial stability in Asia Pacific [J].
Fu, Xiaoqing ;
Lin, Yongjia ;
Molyneux, Philip .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2014, 38 :64-77
[55]   The Role of Technology in Mortgage Lending [J].
Fuster, Andreas ;
Plosser, Matthew ;
Schnabl, Philipp ;
Vickery, James .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2019, 32 (05) :1854-1899
[56]   Macroprudential capital requirements and systemic risk [J].
Gauthier, Celine ;
Lehar, Alfred ;
Souissi, Moez .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION, 2012, 21 (04) :594-618
[57]   Bank funding costs in a rising interest rate environment [J].
Gerlach, Jeffrey R. ;
Mora, Nada ;
Uysal, Pinar .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2018, 87 :164-186
[58]   Bartik Instruments: What, When. Why, and How [J].
Goldsmith-Pinkham, Paul ;
Sorkin, Isaac ;
Swift, Henry .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2020, 110 (08) :2586-2624
[59]   Developing a unified definition of digital transformation [J].
Gong, Cheng ;
Ribiere, Vincent .
TECHNOVATION, 2021, 102
[60]   Blockchain application and outlook in the banking industry [J].
Guo, Ye ;
Liang, Chen .
FINANCIAL INNOVATION, 2016, 2 (01)