Predicting edge cracking in sheet metal forming: evaluating machine learning models and data transformations

被引:0
作者
Contente, Jose [1 ]
Prates, Pedro [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aveiro, Dept Phys, Campus Univ Santiago, P-3810193 Aveiro, Portugal
[2] Univ Aveiro, Ctr Mech Technol & Automat, Dept Mech Engn, Campus Univ Santiago, P-3810193 Aveiro, Portugal
[3] Intelligent Syst Associate Lab LASI, P-4800058 Guimaraes, Portugal
关键词
Sheet metal forming; Machine learning; Supervised regression; Edge cracking; Data transformation; HOLE EXPANSION TEST;
D O I
10.1007/s00170-025-15721-6
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This work evaluates the performance of machine learning algorithms in predicting the strain values at which edge cracking occurs in sheet metal forming. Four regression models-Extreme Gradient Boosting, multilayer perceptron, support vector regression, and Gaussian processes-were tested, alongside two ensemble methods: majority voting and stacking. The models were trained and tested using a dataset of mechanical properties from 163 rolled steel sheet samples, derived from hole expansion and uniaxial tensile tests. The tensile test provided yield stress, tensile strength, deformation at maximum load, and elongation after fracture in both rolling and transverse directions, while the hole expansion test measured the deformation at which edge cracking occurs. The models were evaluated based on four metrics: root mean square relative error, maximum absolute error, mean absolute error, and R-squared value. Additionally, the impact of data transformations, including standardization, Box-Cox transformation, min-max normalization, and L2 normalization, was analyzed. The results demonstrate that Extreme Gradient Boosting and ensemble methods provide the most robust predictions, with significant performance improvements observed when data transformations are applied.
引用
收藏
页码:3089 / 3107
页数:19
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2021, E8E8M 21 STANDARD TE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, METALLIC MAT SHEET S
[3]   XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System [J].
Chen, Tianqi ;
Guestrin, Carlos .
KDD'16: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, 2016, :785-794
[4]   Application of Digital Image Processing Techniques to Detect Through-Thickness Crack in Hole Expansion Test [J].
Cruz, Daniel J. ;
Amaral, Rui L. ;
Santos, Abel D. ;
Tavares, Joao Manuel .
METALS, 2023, 13 (07)
[5]   Identification of Yld2000-2d anisotropic yield function parameters from single hole expansion test using machine learning [J].
Kim, Jinjae ;
Ebrahim, Abrar S. ;
Kinsey, Brad L. ;
Ha, Jinjin .
CIRP ANNALS-MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 73 (01) :233-236
[6]   Microstructure-property relation and machine learning prediction of hole expansion capacity of high-strength steels [J].
Li, Wei ;
Vittorietti, Martina ;
Jongbloed, Geurt ;
Sietsma, Jilt .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2021, 56 (34) :19228-19243
[7]  
Marques AE, 2022, MACHINE LEARNING ART, P127, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-91006-86, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-91006-8_6]
[8]   Machine learning applications in sheet metal constitutive Modelling: A review [J].
Marques, Armando E. ;
Pereira, Andre F. G. ;
Ribeiro, Bernardete M. ;
Prates, Pedro A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2024, 303
[9]  
Nippon Steel Corporation, 2003, 2003 NIPP STEEL TECH, V88, P13
[10]   A critical review on hole expansion ratio [J].
Paul, Surajit Kumar .
MATERIALIA, 2020, 9