From Participation to Trust? Understanding Trust Dynamics in Participatory Science Communication

被引:1
作者
Momme, Jane Martha [1 ]
Hendriks, Friederike [2 ]
Enzingmueller, Carolin [1 ]
机构
[1] IPN Leibniz Inst Sci & Math Educ, Kiel, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Carolo Wilhelmina Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany
关键词
science communication; participation; epistemic trust; trustworthiness; credibility; PERCEIVED TRUSTWORTHINESS; CREDIBILITY ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.1177/10755470251333399
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Trust in science is both a goal and prerequisite for science communication. While participatory methods are claimed to build this trust, supporting evidence remains limited. In an online experiment (N = 725), we investigated how different levels of participation in designing an article impact message credibility, trustworthiness, and trust intention toward a scientist. Active participation enhanced perceptions of the scientist's benevolence and integrity but not their expertise or message credibility. Prior participation intentions moderated most effects. Conversely, awareness of others' participation increased trust intention. These findings highlight the complexity of trust in science and the need for tailored participatory approaches.
引用
收藏
页数:36
相关论文
共 71 条
[51]   Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Co-creation [J].
Rock, Jenny ;
McGuire, Mark ;
Rogers, Alexandra .
SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2018, 40 (04) :541-552
[52]  
Sanders E. B.-N., 2008, CODESIGN, V4, P5, DOI [DOI 10.1080/15710880701875068, https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068]
[53]   The different audiences of science communication: A segmentation analysis of the Swiss population's perceptions of science and their information and media use patterns [J].
Schafer, Mike S. ;
Fuchslin, Tobias ;
Metag, Julia ;
Kristiansen, Silje ;
Rauchfleisch, Adrian .
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2018, 27 (07) :836-856
[54]   Genuine Participation in Design Practice: Towards a Possible Metric [J].
Segalowitz, Miri ;
Chamorro-Koc, Marianella .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ART & DESIGN EDUCATION, 2018, 37 (02) :199-210
[55]  
Sheeran P., 2002, EUR REV SOC PSYCHOL, V12, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1080/14792772143000003, 10.1080/14792772143000003]
[56]   Public perception of scientists: Experimental evidence on the role of sociodemographic, partisan, and professional characteristics [J].
Sonmez, Burak ;
Makarovs, Kirils ;
Allum, Nick .
PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (07)
[57]   Epistemic Vigilance [J].
Sperber, Dan ;
Clement, Fabrice ;
Heintz, Christophe ;
Mascaro, Olivier ;
Mercier, Hugo ;
Origgi, Gloria ;
Wilson, Deirdre .
MIND & LANGUAGE, 2010, 25 (04) :359-393
[58]  
Steen M, 2011, INT J DES, V5, P53
[59]   Public online engagement with science information: on the road to a theoretical framework and a future research agenda [J].
Taddicken, Monika ;
Kramer, Nicole .
JCOM-JOURNAL OF SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2021, 20 (03) :1-18
[60]   Voice in Political Decision-Making: The Effect of Group Voice on Perceived Trustworthiness of Decision Makers and Subsequent Acceptance of Decisions [J].
Terwel, Bart W. ;
Harinck, Fieke ;
Ellemers, Naomi ;
Damen, Dancker D. L. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-APPLIED, 2010, 16 (02) :173-186