Fragmentation of national research systems: the case of the Netherlands

被引:0
作者
van der Pol, Janpieter [1 ]
Frenken, Koen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Collaboration; Co-authorship; Gravity equation; Reform; Science policy;
D O I
10.1007/s11192-025-05310-5
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
We present a statistical framework based on the gravity model to analyze inter-organizational research collaboration to assess the fragmentation of a national research system. We focus on the Dutch research system during the period 2010-2022 characterized by multiple policy changes to reduce the fragmentation and to align agendas among the key organizations: classic universities, technical universities, university medical centers, universities of applied sciences, and public research organizations. Using the gravity equation, we explain the intensity of collaboration between any two organizations while controlling for their respective sizes and travel distance. By looking at the standardized residuals of the regression analysis over time, we assess whether organizations tend to collaborate more or less than what can be expected from their respective sizes and travel distance. Our main finding holds that a process of defragmentation of the Dutch research system is somewhat visible, especially in closer collaborations between the universities of applied sciences (UAS) with other organizations. At the same time, technical and classic universities have become more detached from each other. And, public research organizations have not become much more integrated within the research system, despite calls to do so. These findings suggest that the process of integration is a variegated and slow one, exposing the limited ability of national governments to steer research systems in top-down manners.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Science and Public Policy, DOI 10.1093/spp/23.5.279
[2]   The architecture of complex weighted networks [J].
Barrat, A ;
Barthélemy, M ;
Pastor-Satorras, R ;
Vespignani, A .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2004, 101 (11) :3747-3752
[3]   Which Cities Produce More Excellent Papers Than Can Be Expected? A New Mapping Approach, Using Google Maps, Based on Statistical Significance Testing [J].
Bornmann, Lutz ;
Leydesdorff, Loet .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 62 (10) :1954-1962
[4]  
Cooke P., 2006, Journal of Technology Transfer, V31, P5, DOI DOI 10.1007/S10961-005-5009-3
[5]   Technology sovereignty as an emerging frame for innovation policy. Defining rationales, ends and means* [J].
Edler, Jakob ;
Blind, Knut ;
Kroll, Henning ;
Schubert, Torben .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2023, 52 (06)
[6]  
Gibbons M., 1994, The new production of knowledge. The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies
[7]   Research collaboration at a distance: Changing spatial patterns of scientific collaboration within Europe [J].
Hoekman, Jarno ;
Frenken, Koen ;
Tijssen, Robert J. W. .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2010, 39 (05) :662-673
[8]   Boundary spanning R&D collaboration: Key enabling technologies and missions as alleviators of proximity effects? [J].
Janssen, Matthijs J. ;
Abbasiharofteh, Milad .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2022, 180
[9]   What bangs for your buck? Assessing the design and impact of Dutch transformative policy [J].
Janssen, Matthijs J. .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2019, 138 :78-94
[10]   Transforming innovation policy in the context of global security [J].
Kivimaa, Paula .
ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2022, 43 :55-61