Does co-development facilitate achieving useful planning tools? A socio-technical approach to the development of information model-based land use planning in Finland

被引:0
作者
Nummi, Pilvi [1 ]
Hapuoja, Anni [2 ]
机构
[1] Aalto Univ, Finland & FinEst Ctr Smart Cities, Dept Built Environm, Espoo, Estonia
[2] Et May Oy, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
Digital planning; Plan information model; Land use planning; Co-development; Interoperability; Digital plan data; DECISION-SUPPORT; SYSTEMS; DESIGN; PSS;
D O I
10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2025.102291
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The digitalization of urban planning entails a shift to information model-based planning, where plans are produced in a machine-readable and interoperable format. In Finland, a nationally interoperable information model for land use plans has been applied for the first time to digital planning tools in the recently completed project KAATIO. In this article, we apply socio-technical approach to assess how co-development in this project was perceived by municipal planners and software developers, and how did the tools developed meet the needs of planners and planning practice. The results show that a technology-driven culture dominates the national development and hampers the socio-technical approach. Despite the challenges, co-development is beneficial for both software developers and municipal actors. In conclusion, we argue that, in this context, empowering users, facilitating the discussion on information model-based planning, future-oriented understanding of planning tasks, and accepting the diversity of practices while harmonizing the plan data are essential for promoting human factors in the development.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2017, New European Interoperability Framework, Promoting seamless services and data flows for European public administrations
[2]   Effectiveness of collaborative map-based decision support tools: Results of an experiment [J].
Arciniegas, Gustavo ;
Janssen, Ron ;
Rietveld, Piet .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2013, 39 :159-175
[3]  
Auerbach C., 2003, Qualitative Data: An Introduction to Coding and Analysis
[4]  
Bostrom R. P., 1977, MIS Q, V1, P11, DOI [DOI 10.2307/248710, 10.2307/248710]
[5]   A Meta-Theory for Understanding Information Systems Within Sociotechnical Systems [J].
Bostrom, Robert P. ;
Gupta, Saurabh ;
Thomas, Dominic .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2009, 26 (01) :17-47
[6]  
Branbury H., 2015, The SAGE handbook of action research, V3, P1, DOI [DOI 10.4135/9781473921290, 10.4135/9781473921290]
[7]   Digital disruption and planning - use of data and digital technology by professional planners, and perceptions of change to planning work [J].
Daniel, C. ;
Pettit, C. .
AUSTRALIAN PLANNER, 2021, 57 (01) :50-64
[8]   USER-CENTERED DESIGN - FOR USERS OR BY USERS [J].
EASON, KD .
ERGONOMICS, 1995, 38 (08) :1667-1673
[9]   Interactive spatial tools for the design of regional adaptation strategies [J].
Eikelboom, T. ;
Janssen, R. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2013, 127 :S6-S14
[10]   Emerging digital plan data - new research perspectives on planning practice and evaluation [J].
Fertner, Christian ;
Christensen, Andreas Aagaard ;
Andersen, Peter Stubkjaer ;
Olafsson, Anton Stahl ;
Praestholm, Soren ;
Caspersen, Ole Hjorth ;
Grunfelder, Julien .
GEOGRAFISK TIDSSKRIFT-DANISH JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 119 (01) :6-16