Calibration of DEM input parameters for simulation of the cohesive materials: Comparison of response surface method and machine learning models

被引:0
作者
Jadidi, Behrooz [1 ]
Ebrahimi, Mohammadreza [1 ]
Ein-Mozaffari, Farhad [1 ]
Lohi, Ali [1 ]
机构
[1] Toronto Metropolitan Univ, Dept Chem Engn, 350 Victoria St, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada
来源
PARTICUOLOGY | 2025年 / 100卷
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Machine learning; Discrete element method (DEM); Granular mixing; Model calibration; Cohesive particles; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; DISPERSE SOLID PARTICLES; DISCRETE ELEMENT METHOD; OPTIMIZATION; DESIGN; COMPRESSION; SEGREGATION; DRIVEN; FLOW;
D O I
10.1016/j.partic.2025.03.018
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
This paper presents a methodology for calibrating discrete element method input parameters for simulating cohesive materials. The Plackett-Burman method was initially employed to identify the significant input parameters. Subsequently, the performances of response surface methodology (RSM), artificial neural networks (ANN), and random forest (RF) models for calibration were compared. The results demonstrated that the random forest model outperformed the two other models, achieving an RMSE of 1.89, an R-squared of 94 %, and an MAE of 1.63. The ANN model followed closely, with an RMSE of 3.12, an R-squared of 89 %, and an MAE of 2.18, while the RSM model exhibited lower performance with an RMSE of 6.84, an R-squared of 86 %, and an MAE of 5.41. This study presents a framework for enhancing the accuracy of DEM simulations. Finally, the robustness and adaptability of the calibration approach were demonstrated by applying calibrated parameters from one particle size to another. (c) 2025 Chinese Society of Particuology and Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:214 / 231
页数:18
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
Agarap A F., Deep Learning using Rectified Linear Units
[2]   Review of Discrete Element Method Simulations of Soil Tillage and Furrow Opening [J].
Aikins, Kojo Atta ;
Ucgul, Mustafa ;
Barr, James B. ;
Awuah, Emmanuel ;
Antille, Diogenes L. ;
Jensen, Troy A. ;
Desbiolles, Jacky M. A. .
AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2023, 13 (03)
[3]   Avalanching flow of cohesive powders [J].
Alexander, Albert W. ;
Chaudhuri, Bodhisattwa ;
Faqih, AbdulMobeen ;
Muzzio, Fernando J. ;
Davies, Clive ;
Tomassone, M. Silvina .
POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 164 (01) :13-21
[4]   Prediction of the strength of mineral admixture concrete using multivariable regression analysis and an artificial neural network [J].
Atici, U. .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (08) :9609-9618
[5]   Identification of DEM simulation parameters by Artificial Neural Networks and bulk experiments [J].
Benvenuti, L. ;
Kloss, C. ;
Pirker, S. .
POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 291 :456-465
[6]   Contact models for the multi-sphere discrete element method [J].
Berry, Nathan ;
Zhang, Yonghao ;
Haeri, Sina .
POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 416
[7]   Discrete element simulation study of a Freeman powder rheometer [J].
Bharadwaj, Rahul ;
Ketterhagen, William R. ;
Hancock, Bruno C. .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2010, 65 (21) :5747-5756
[8]   Bonded-particle model calibration using response surface methodology [J].
Chehreghani, Sajjad ;
Noaparast, Mohammad ;
Rezai, Bahram ;
Shafaei, Sied Ziaedin .
PARTICUOLOGY, 2017, 32 :141-152
[9]   Research of laser ultrasonic defect statistics recognition technology based on radial basis function neural network [J].
Choe, JinHyok ;
Jon, Song ;
Ryang, WonSok ;
Yun, YongMi ;
So, Juhyok .
OPTICS AND LASER TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 150
[10]   Calibration of the discrete element method [J].
Coetzee, C. J. .
POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 310 :104-142