共 35 条
Using the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form to Predict Functioning After Treatment for Borderline Personality Disorder: A Machine Learning Approach
被引:0
|作者:
Wibbelink, Carlijn J. M.
[1
]
Sellbom, Martin
[2
]
Grasman, Raoul P. P. P.
[3
]
Arntz, Arnoud
[1
,4
]
Sinnaeve, Roland
[5
]
Kamphuis, Jan H.
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Clin Psychol, POB 15933, NL-1001 NK Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Otago, Dept Psychol, Otago, New Zealand
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Psychol Methods, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Acad Ctr Trauma & Personal, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Mind Body Res, Dept Neurosci, Herestr 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
关键词:
borderline personality disorder;
predictors;
machine learning;
Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form;
treatment response;
DIALECTICAL BEHAVIOR-THERAPY;
TIME-TO-ATTAINMENT;
SOCIETAL COST;
RC SCALES;
RECOVERY;
OUTCOMES;
PSYCHOPATHOLOGY;
ALLIANCE;
MODELS;
REGULARIZATION;
D O I:
10.1037/pas0001385
中图分类号:
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号:
040203 ;
摘要:
Insight into predictors of functioning after treatment for borderline personality disorder (BPD) is limited, despite growing recognition that more focus on other aspects of recovery, especially psychosocial functioning, is warranted. The present study explored the utility of a widely used omnibus assessment instrument, the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF), to predict change in functioning during treatment for BPD. Data were obtained from a randomized clinical trial into the effectiveness of 2-year evidence-based treatment for BPD (dialectical behavior therapy or schema therapy) among 130 participants diagnosed with BPD. Different machine learning algorithms, including elastic net regression (ENR), random forest, gradient boosting machine, and extreme gradient boosting, were implemented using nested cross-validation. The ENR model had an average explained variance of 42%. A combination of baseline functioning and four MMPI-2-RF scales emerged as key predictors of change in functioning. Baseline functioning was the most important predictor, with lower initial functioning levels related to more improvement. Higher scores on ideas of persecution, somatic complaints, family problems, and disconstraint were associated with less improvement in functioning. Given the risk of overfitting and the lack of an independent data set, future research should focus on the replicability and generalizability of the findings, as well as clarifying the underlying mechanisms. Our study serves as a first step in identifying patients at risk of poor functional outcome after treatment for BPD.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文