Information Ambiguity, Market Institutions, and Asset Prices: Experimental Evidence

被引:0
作者
Bao, Te [1 ]
Duffy, John [2 ,3 ]
Zhu, Jiahua [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Social Sci, Singapore 639818, Singapore
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Econ, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[3] Osaka Univ, Inst Social & Econ Res, Osaka 5670047, Japan
[4] Kings Coll London, Kings Business Sch, London WC2B 4BG, England
[5] Univ Essex, Essex Business Sch, Wivenhoe Pk, Colchester CO4 3SQ, Essex, England
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ambiguity aversion; information ambiguity; asset bubbles; experimental finance; signal extraction; PORTFOLIO CHOICES; EXPECTED UTILITY; RISK; AVERSION; PREFERENCES; UNCERTAINTY; EXPECTATIONS; ATTITUDES; MODELS;
D O I
10.1287/mnsc.2022.01223
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
We explore how information ambiguity and traders' attitudes toward such ambiguity affect expectations and asset prices under three different market institutions. Specifically, we test a theoretical prediction that information ambiguity will lead market prices to overreact to bad news and underreact to good news. We find that such an asymmetric reaction exists and is strongest in individual prediction markets. It occurs to a lesser extent in single price call markets. It is weakest of all in double auction markets, in which buyers' asymmetric reaction to good/bad news is cancelled out by the opposite asymmetric reaction of sellers.
引用
收藏
页码:3232 / 3252
页数:22
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   Estimating ambiguity aversion in a portfolio choice experiment [J].
Ahn, David ;
Choi, Syngjoo ;
Gale, Douglas ;
Kariv, Shachar .
QUANTITATIVE ECONOMICS, 2014, 5 (02) :195-223
[2]   IT IS NOT JUST CONFUSION! STRATEGIC UNCERTAINTY IN AN EXPERIMENTAL ASSET MARKET [J].
Akiyama, Eizo ;
Hanaki, Nobuyuki ;
Ishikawa, Ryuichiro .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2017, 127 (605) :F563-F580
[3]   Beauty contests and iterated expectations in asset markets [J].
Allen, Franklin ;
Morris, Stephen ;
Shin, Hyun Song .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2006, 19 (03) :719-752
[4]   Asset Pricing and Asymmetric Reasoning [J].
Asparouhova, Elena ;
Bossaerts, Peter ;
Eguia, Jon ;
Zame, William .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2015, 123 (01) :66-122
[5]   Explaining bargaining impasse: The role of self-serving biases [J].
Babcock, L ;
Loewenstein, G .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1997, 11 (01) :109-126
[6]   Choosing the wrong pond: Social comparisons in negotiations that reflect a self-serving bias [J].
Babcock, L ;
Wang, XH ;
Loewenstein, G .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1996, 111 (01) :1-19
[7]   Judgemental overconfidence, self-monitoring, and trading performance in an experimental financial market [J].
Biais, B ;
Hilton, D ;
Mazurier, K ;
Pouget, S .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2005, 72 (02) :287-312
[8]   Hindsight Bias, Risk Perception, and Investment Performance [J].
Biais, Bruno ;
Weber, Martin .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2009, 55 (06) :1018-1029
[9]   Ambiguity Preferences and Portfolio Choices: Evidence from the Field [J].
Bianchi, Milo ;
Tallon, Jean-Marc .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2019, 65 (04) :1486-1501
[10]   An experimental test of generalized ambiguity aversion using lottery pricing tasks [J].
Bleaney, M ;
Humphrey, SJ .
THEORY AND DECISION, 2006, 60 (2-3) :257-282