Facial or non-facial? The impact of emoji types on chatbots' service recovery

被引:1
作者
Wei, Wenzhong [1 ]
Cai, Zhihao [1 ]
Mao, Minrui [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Business Sch, Weihai, Peoples R China
关键词
Chatbots; Emoji; Service recovery; Willingness to forgive; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; APOLOGIES; EMOTIONS; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1108/APJML-11-2024-1781
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - This study aims to explore the impact of the types of emojis used in chatbots' service recovery on consumers' willingness to forgive. Design/methodology/approach - Two experiments were conducted to test the proposed hypotheses. Findings - The results show that chatbots using negative facial emojis are more sincere and reflect on higher levels of forgiveness than response using negative non-facial emojis. This study also explores the moderating influence of recovery strategies in the proposed relationship. Emojis only influence consumers' willingness to forgive when the recovery strategy is symbolic recovery. Research limitations/implications - This study mainly focuses on comparing the overall effect of chatbots' use of emojis' types on consumers' willingness to forgive and fails to explore in depth the differences in the effect of chatbots' use of emojis' types on consumers' satisfaction with recovery under various contexts or conditions. Practical implications - First, the use of emojis can alleviate the dissatisfaction of the user and increase the user's satisfaction with the service. Second, this study found that the types of emojis used in chatbots' service recovery have an impact on consumers' willingness to forgive. Finally, the recovery strategy adopted by enterprises also affects consumers' willingness to forgive chatbots' service recovery. Originality/value - This study provides important insights into the underlying mechanisms and boundary conditions of the effective use of emojis in chatbots' service recovery.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Chatbots' effectiveness in service recovery [J].
Agnihotri, Arpita ;
Bhattacharya, Saurabh .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2024, 76
[2]   A Systematic Review of Emoji: Current Research and Future Perspectives [J].
Bai, Qiyu ;
Dan, Qi ;
Mu, Zhe ;
Yang, Maokun .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 10
[3]   A Bot and a Smile: Interpersonal Impressions of Chatbots and Humans Using Emoji in Computer-mediated Communication [J].
Beattie, Austin ;
Edwards, Autumn P. ;
Edwards, Chad .
COMMUNICATION STUDIES, 2020, 71 (03) :409-427
[4]  
Blumer H., 1986, Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method
[5]   What kind of emotions do emoticons communicate? [J].
Brito, Pedro Quelhas ;
Tones, Sandra ;
Fernandes, Jessica .
ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MARKETING AND LOGISTICS, 2020, 32 (07) :1495-1517
[6]   Evaluation of Robot Emotion Expressions for Human-Robot Interaction [J].
Cardenas, Pedro ;
Garcia, Jose ;
Begazo, Rolinson ;
Aguilera, Ana ;
Dongo, Irvin ;
Cardinale, Yudith .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ROBOTICS, 2024, 16 (9-10) :2019-2041
[7]   To Err Is Human(-oid): How Do Consumers React to Robot Service Failure and Recovery? [J].
Choi, Sungwoo ;
Mattila, Anna S. ;
Bolton, Lisa E. .
JOURNAL OF SERVICE RESEARCH, 2021, 24 (03) :354-371
[8]   To emoji or not to emoji? Examining the influence of emoji on consumer reactions to advertising [J].
Das, Gopal ;
Wiener, Hillary J. D. ;
Kareklas, Ioannis .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2019, 96 :147-156
[9]   Emoticons and social interaction on the Internet: the importance of social context [J].
Derks, Daantje ;
Bos, Arjan E. R. ;
von Grumbkow, Jasper .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2007, 23 (01) :842-849
[10]   Emojis as Social Information in Digital Communication [J].
Erle, Thorsten M. ;
Schmid, Karoline ;
Goslar, Simon H. ;
Martin, Jared D. .
EMOTION, 2022, 22 (07) :1529-1543