Decoding Learning Design Decisions: A Cluster Analysis of 12,749 Teaching and Learning Activities

被引:0
作者
Albuquerque, Josmario [1 ]
Rienties, Bart [1 ]
Divjak, Blazenka [2 ]
机构
[1] Open Univ, Inst Educ Technol, Milton Keynes, Bucks, England
[2] Univ Zagreb, Fac Org & Informat, Zagreb, Croatia
来源
FIFTEENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LEARNING ANALYTICS & KNOWLEDGE, LAK 2025 | 2025年
关键词
Learning Design; Learning Analytics; Cluster Analysis; Teaching and Learning Activities; Artificial Intelligence; ANALYTICS; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1145/3706468.3706520
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Substantial progress has been made in how educators can be supported to implement effective learning design (LD) with learning analytics (LA). However, how educators make micro-decisions about designing individual teaching and learning activities (TLAs) and how these are related to wider pedagogical approaches has received limited empirical support. This study explored how 165 educators designed and integrated 12,749 TLA in 218 LDs using clustering, pattern-mining, and correlational analysis. The findings suggest most educators use a combination of four common LD TLAs (i.e., Collaboration, Generating independent learning, Assessment, and Traditional classroom activities). The four common TLAs could be used to develop LA and Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) approaches to support educators in making more informed and evidence-based design decisions for effective learning and teaching.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 417
页数:11
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Connecting the dots - A literature review on learning analytics indicators from a learning design perspective
    Ahmad, Atezaz
    Schneider, Jan
    Griffiths, Dai
    Biedermann, Daniel
    Schiffner, Daniel
    Greller, Wolfgang
    Drachsler, Hendrik
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2024, 40 (06) : 2432 - 2470
  • [2] Supporting students' basic psychological needs and satisfaction in a blended learning environment through learning analytics
    Ameloot, Elise
    Rotsaert, Tijs
    Ameloot, Thomas
    Rienties, Bart
    Schellens, Tammy
    [J]. COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2024, 209
  • [3] Biggs J., 2007, Teaching for quality learning at university: what the student does, VThird
  • [4] K-modes clustering
    Chaturvedi, A
    Green, PE
    Carroll, JD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLASSIFICATION, 2001, 18 (01) : 35 - 55
  • [5] Conole G., 2013, Designing for learning in an open world, V4, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4419-8517-0, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-8517-0]
  • [6] Does an individualized learning design improve university student online learning? A randomized field experiment
    Dietrich, Julia
    Greiner, Franziska
    Weber-Liel, Dorit
    Berweger, Belinda
    Kaempfe, Nicole
    Kracke, Barbel
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2021, 122
  • [7] Balanced Learning Design Planning: Concept and Tool
    Divjak, Blazenka
    Grabar, Darko
    Svetec, Barbi
    Vondra, Petra
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMATION AND ORGANIZATIONAL SCIENCES, 2022, 46 (02) : 361 - 375
  • [8] Assessment validity and learning analytics as prerequisites for ensuring student-centred learning design
    Divjak, Blazenka
    Svetec, Barbi
    Horvat, Damir
    Kadoic, Nikola
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 54 (01) : 313 - 334
  • [9] Learning analytics driven improvements in learning design in higher education: A systematic literature review
    Drugova, Elena
    Zhuravleva, Irina
    Zakharova, Ulyana
    Latipov, Adel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2024, 40 (02) : 510 - 524
  • [10] Analytics for learning design: A layered framework and tools
    Hernandez-Leo, Davinia
    Martinez-Maldonado, Roberto
    Pardo, Abelardo
    Munoz-Cristobal, Juan A.
    Rodriguez-Triana, Maria J.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 50 (01) : 139 - 152