Identifying Active Ingredients of the Association Between Neighborhood Disadvantage and Disordered Eating in Youth

被引:0
作者
Mikhail, Megan E. [1 ,2 ]
Klump, Kelly L. [1 ]
Pearson, Amber L. [3 ,4 ]
Burt, S. Alexandra [1 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Psychol, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Michigan State Univ, Dept Publ Hlth, Flint, MI USA
[4] Univ Otago, Dept Publ Hlth, Wellington, New Zealand
关键词
childhood; disadvantage; disordered eating; neighborhood; socioeconomic status; violence; TWIN REGISTRY MSUTR; GENETIC INFLUENCES; BODY DISSATISFACTION; SOCIAL COHESION; MISSING DATA; HEALTH; VIOLENCE; RISK; DEPRIVATION; ENVIRONMENT;
D O I
10.1002/eat.24441
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
BackgroundEmerging research suggests neighborhood disadvantage is associated with disordered eating (DE; e.g., binge eating, body dissatisfaction) beginning in middle childhood, with effects that increment those of proximal disadvantage (e.g., family income). Understanding factors that contribute to early risk for youth living in disadvantaged neighborhoods is critical because childhood DE predisposes youth to more severe eating disorders in adolescence/adulthood. However, the specific "active ingredients" through which neighborhoods impact DE remain unknown. We examined community violence exposure and limited neighborhood resources (e.g., green spaces, recreational facilities) as two notable neighborhood-level stressors that could contribute to early associations between more distal disadvantage and DE.MethodParticipants included girls and boys oversampled for neighborhood disadvantage from the MSU Twin Registry (N = 2060; Mage = 8.02; 48.7% female). Analyses used structural equation modeling to examine whether community violence exposure and neighbor informant reports of neighborhood resources were associated with DE after accounting for proximal youth characteristics (e.g., family income, racial identity).ResultsCommunity violence exposure was significantly associated with DE (b = 0.20, 95% CI [0.14, 0.27]), but neighborhood resources were not (b = 0.04, 95% CI [-0.13, 0.22]). Associations were consistent across multiple potential moderators, including age, sex, racial identity, family income, and body mass index.ConclusionsCommunity violence is a significant stressor that may help explain associations between neighborhood disadvantage and DE in youth. Additional research is needed to understand the underlying cognitive, affective, and biological mechanisms through which violence exposure may increase the risk for DE in under-resourced contexts.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 79 条
  • [1] Neighborhood Racial and Economic Privilege and Timing of Pubertal Onset in Girls
    Acker, Julia
    Mujahid, Mahasin
    Aghaee, Sara
    Gomez, Scarlett
    Shariff-Marco, Salma
    Chu, Brandon
    Deardorff, Julianna
    Kubo, Ai
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2023, 72 (03) : 419 - 427
  • [2] Delayed Disadvantage: Neighborhood Context and Child Development
    Alvarado, Steven Elias
    [J]. SOCIAL FORCES, 2016, 94 (04) : 1847 - 1877
  • [3] Bergmann K. R., 2022, JAMA Network Open, V5
  • [4] Food insecurity and disordered eating behaviors in children and adolescents: A systematic review
    Bidopia, Tatyana
    Carbo, Alejandra Vivas
    Ross, Rachel A.
    Burke, Natasha L.
    [J]. EATING BEHAVIORS, 2023, 49
  • [5] Lifetime family violence exposure is associated with current symptoms of eating disorders among both young men and women
    Brady, Sonya S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMATIC STRESS, 2008, 21 (03) : 347 - 351
  • [6] Brewerton T.D., 2015, The Wiley Handbook of Eating Disorders, P445
  • [7] An Overview of Trauma-Informed Care and Practice for Eating Disorders
    Brewerton, Timothy D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGGRESSION MALTREATMENT & TRAUMA, 2019, 28 (04) : 445 - 462
  • [8] TOWARD AN EXPERIMENTAL ECOLOGY OF HUMAN-DEVELOPMENT
    BRONFENBRENNER, U
    [J]. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1977, 32 (07) : 513 - 531
  • [9] Burgard S. A., 2012, Persisting Hardships in Southeast Michigan after the Great Recession. University of Michigan National Poverty Center
  • [10] Policy Brief 33