Crowding in or crowding out? Evidence from discontinuity in the assignment of business R&D subsidies

被引:0
作者
Bajgar, Matej [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Srholec, Martin [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Charles Univ Prague, CERGE EI, Joint Workplace, Prague, Czech Republic
[2] Czech Acad Sci, Econ Inst, Prague, Czech Republic
[3] Charles Univ Prague, Inst Econ Studies, Fac Social Sci, Prague, Czech Republic
[4] Czech Stat Off, Prague, Czech Republic
关键词
Regression discontinuity design; Research and development; Business subsidies; Innovation policy; DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENT; PUBLIC SUBSIDIES; MARKET FAILURES; INCENTIVES; PERFORMANCE; INNOVATION; STIMULATE; SUPPORT; DESIGN; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpubeco.2025.105357
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We employ a regression discontinuity design to study the effects of a flagship business R&D subsidy programme in the Czech Republic on R&D investment, patenting and economic performance of the supported firms. The R&D subsidies stimulated R&D expenditure in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) but not in large firms. In SMEs, public funding succeeded in crowding in private R&D investment, and 1 unit of public subsidy was associated with about 2.3 units of additional R&D expenditure. The positive effects on R&D expenditure of SMEs were sustained after the original projects ended, possibly thanks to subsequent subsidies from the same funding provider. Supported SMEs also saw their sales increase in the short term, but we do not observe any positive effects of the support on patenting, employment or longer-term sales and productivity. We find evidence that the subsidies crowded out private R&D expenditure in large firms and financing constraints played an important role in explaining the effect heterogeneity.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Tax Credits and Small Firm R&D Spending [J].
Agrawal, Ajay ;
Rosell, Carlos ;
Simcoe, Timothy .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-ECONOMIC POLICY, 2020, 12 (02) :1-21
[2]   FINANCIAL RATIOS, DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS AND PREDICTION OF CORPORATE BANKRUPTCY [J].
ALTMAN, EI .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1968, 23 (04) :589-609
[3]   The "Matthew effect" in R&D public subsidies: The Italian evidence [J].
Antonelli, Cristiano ;
Crespi, Francesco .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2013, 80 (08) :1523-1534
[4]  
Appelt Silvia, 2025, CEP Discussion Paper 2071
[5]  
Arrow KJ, 1962, RATE DIRECTION INVEN, P609
[6]   PUBLIC R&D POLICIES AND PRIVATE R&D INVESTMENT: A SURVEY OF THE EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE [J].
Becker, Bettina .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SURVEYS, 2015, 29 (05) :917-942
[7]   Are firms that receive R&D subsidies more innovative? [J].
Berube, Charles ;
Mohnen, Pierre .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE, 2009, 42 (01) :206-225
[8]   The Matthew effect in science funding [J].
Bol, Thijs ;
de Vaan, Mathijs ;
van de Rijt, Arnout .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2018, 115 (19) :4887-4890
[9]   The impact of R&D subsidies on firm innovation [J].
Bronzini, Raffaello ;
Piselli, Paolo .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2016, 45 (02) :442-457
[10]   Are Incentives for R&D Effective? Evidence from a Regression Discontinuity Approach [J].
Bronzini, Raffaello ;
Iachini, Eleonora .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-ECONOMIC POLICY, 2014, 6 (04) :100-134