Evaluation of a Terrestrial Laser Scanner According to the ISO 17123-9 Standard

被引:0
作者
Polo, María-Eugenia [1 ]
Sánchez-Ríos, Alonso [1 ]
Pardo, Pedro J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Dept. of Graphic Expression, Centro Universitario de Mérida, Universidad de Extremadura, Santa Teresa de Jornet 38, Merida
[2] Dept. of Computer and Networks Systems Engineering, Centro Universitario de Merida, Universidad de Extremadura, Santa Teresa de Jornet 38, Merida
关键词
ISO; 17123; Measurements uncertainty; Reflectance measurement; Target design; Terrestrial laser scanner;
D O I
10.1061/JSUED2.SUENG-1566
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Currently, the use of terrestrial laser scanners (TLSs) for point cloud recording is widespread in the fields of architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC), with dimensional tolerance requirements ranging from a few millimeters to several centimeters. The technical specifications of TLSs define the nominal three-dimensional (3D) point accuracy based on distance. In practice, both the design of the TLS and the proprietary software calculation algorithms are key factors in the competition between manufacturers and are therefore not public. This, together with the multiple determinants of each type of work, makes it difficult to assume those values; so, it becomes necessary to use external models to study TLS error sources and standardized evaluation test procedures to determine and evaluate the precision of a TLS and its measurement uncertainties. In this work, we use the international standard ISO 17123-9 to evaluate a Leica TLS RTC360 scanner. We consider observation distances from 10 to 50 m, and use targets with different sizes and reflectance values measured with a Micro-Hyperspec hyperspectral camera. The results show that the use of optimal materials increases the range of the instrument used to automatically detect targets. Additionally, the uncertainties range between 2.7 and 3.9 mm (distances between 10 and 40 m), reaching values of 7.7 mm when the distance is extended to 50 m. Finally, some recommendations for improving the field procedure of this standard are described, with a focus on the interests of surveyors and highlighting the importance of the type of target used. © 2025 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Abellan A., Jaboyedoff M., Oppikofer T., Vilaplana J.M., Detection of millimetric deformation using a terrestrial laser scanner: Experiment and application to a rockfall event, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 9, 2, pp. 365-372, (2009)
  • [2] Standard Test Method for Evaluating the Relative-range Measurement Performance of 3D Imaging Systems in the Medium Range, (2015)
  • [3] Becerik-Gerber B., Jazizadeh F., Kavulya G., Calis G., Assessment of target types and layouts in 3D laser scanning for registration accuracy, Autom. Constr., 20, 5, pp. 649-658, (2011)
  • [4] Berger M., Tagliasacchi A., Seversky L., Alliez P., Guennebaud G., Levine J., Sharf A., Silva C., A survey of surface reconstruction from point clouds, Comput. Graph. Forum, 36, 1, pp. 301-329, (2016)
  • [5] Boehler W., Vicent M., Marbs A., Investigating laser scanner accuracy, Proc. CIPA 19th Int. Symp. 2003, Antalya, Turkey: Comité International de Photogrammétrie Architecturale, pp. 696-701, (2003)
  • [6] Bolkas D., Terrestrial laser scanner intensity correction for the incidence angle effect on surfaces with different colours and sheens, Int. J. Remote Sens., 40, 18, pp. 7169-7189, (2019)
  • [7] Bolkas D., Naberezny B., Jacobson M.G., Comparison of sUAS photogrammetry and TLS for detecting changes in soil surface elevations following deep tillage, J. Surv. Eng., 147, 2, (2021)
  • [8] Corso J., Roca J., Buill F., Geometric analysis on stone façades with terrestrial laser scanner technology, Geosciences, 7, 4, (2017)
  • [9] Ge X., Wunderlich T., Target identification in terrestrial laser scanning, Surv. Rev., 47, MAR, pp. 129-140, (2014)
  • [10] Gordon S., Davies N., Keighley D., Lichti D., Franke J., A rigorous rangefinder calibration method for terrestrial laser scanners, J. Spatial Sci., 50, 2, pp. 91-96, (2005)