Safety of vaginal breech delivery following an unsuccessful external cephalic version: a comparative study

被引:0
作者
Aviv, Danit [1 ,2 ]
Weintraub, Amir [1 ,2 ]
Issakov, Gal [1 ,2 ]
Pasternak, Yael [1 ,2 ]
Griffin, Rachel [1 ,2 ]
Shochat, Tzipora [4 ]
Lopian, Miriam [3 ]
Yekel, Yael [1 ,2 ]
Perlman, Sharon [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Ariel Univ, Adelson Sch Med, Ariel, Israel
[2] Laniado Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Divrei Hayim 16, Netanya, Israel
[3] Tel Aviv Univ, Sch Med, Tel Aviv, Israel
[4] Helen Schneider Womens Hosp, Rabin Med Ctr, Petah Tiqwa, Israel
关键词
External cephalic version; Vaginal breech delivery; Trial of labor; Cesarean delivery;
D O I
10.1007/s00404-024-07873-9
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective To determine whether patients undergoing a trial of labor with a breech presentation following a failed attempt of external cephalic version (ECV) are at increased risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single university-affiliated medical center. The study group comprised women with singleton pregnancies at term, categorized into three groups: those who underwent a failed external cephalic version (ECV) and subsequently attempted a trial of breech delivery (Breech-failed-ECV group), those who attempted an assisted vaginal breech delivery without a prior ECV attempt (Breech-no-ECV group), and those with vertex presentation following a successful ECV (Vertex-ECV). The primary outcome measured was the mode of delivery. Secondary outcomes included adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Results The study group consisted of 229 patients who attempted a vaginal delivery during the study period following a diagnosis of non-cephalic presentation at term. There were 42 women in the Breech failed-ECV group, 102 in the Breech-no-ECV group, and 85 in the Vertex-ECV group. Among patients undergoing a trial of labor with a breech presentation, there were no significant differences in successful vaginal delivery rates between those who had an attempted ECV and those who did not (80.39% vs. 80.95%, p > 0.05), nor in the rate of adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes between the groups. However, the Vertex-ECV were more likely to have a vaginal delivery (91.78 vs 80.56%, p = 0.03) and less likely to experience adverse neonatal outcomes, including meconium-stained amniotic fluid, non-reassuring fetal heart rate (NRFHR), compared to those who underwent labor with a breech presentation (p < 0.05). Conclusions A failed external cephalic version does not adversely affect maternal or neonatal outcomes in patients undergoing a trial of labor with a breech presentation and meet the criteria of our study.
引用
收藏
页码:1267 / 1273
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2017, BJOG, V124, pe193, DOI 10.1111/1471-0528.14592
[2]   Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes following unsuccessful external cephalic version: a stratified analysis amongst failures, successes, and controls [J].
Balayla, Jacques ;
Dahdouh, Elias M. ;
Villeneuve, Sophie ;
Boucher, Marc ;
Gauthier, Robert J. ;
Audibert, Francois ;
Fuchs, Florent .
JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2015, 28 (05) :605-610
[3]   Intrapartum intervention rates and perinatal outcomes following successful external cephalic version [J].
Basu, A. ;
Flatley, C. ;
Kumar, S. .
JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2016, 36 (06) :439-442
[4]   External cephalic version: a safe procedure? A systematic review of version-related risks [J].
Collaris, RJ ;
Oei, SG .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2004, 83 (06) :511-518
[5]   Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option?: Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium [J].
Goffinet, F ;
Carayol, M ;
Foidart, JM ;
Alexander, S ;
Uzan, S ;
Subtil, D ;
Bréart, G .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 194 (04) :1002-1011
[6]   External Cephalic Version-Related Risks A Meta-analysis [J].
Grootscholten, Kim ;
Kok, Marjolein ;
Oei, S. Guid ;
Mol, Ben W. J. ;
van der Post, Joris A. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 112 (05) :1143-1151
[7]   Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial [J].
Hannah, ME ;
Hannah, WJ ;
Hewson, SA ;
Hodnett, ED ;
Saigal, S ;
Willan, AR .
LANCET, 2000, 356 (9239) :1375-1383
[8]   PROPHYLACTIC EXTERNAL CEPHALIC VERSION IN AN OBSTETRIC PRACTICE [J].
HIBBARD, LT ;
SCHUMANN, WR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1973, 116 (04) :511-518
[9]   External cephalic version for breech presentation at term [J].
Hofmeyr, G. Justus ;
Kulier, Regina ;
West, Helen M. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2015, (04)
[10]   Does overweight and obesity have an impact on delivery mode and peripartum outcome in breech presentation? A FRABAT cohort study [J].
Jennewein, Lukas ;
Agel, Lena ;
Hoock, Samira Catharina ;
Hentrich, Anna Elisabeth ;
Louwen, Frank ;
Zander, Nadja .
ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2024, 310 (01) :285-292