Towards a unified ontology for monitoring ecosystem services

被引:0
作者
Affinito, F. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Holzer, J. M. [4 ]
Fortin, M. -J. [5 ]
Gonzalez, A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Biol, 1205 Dr Penfield Ave, Montreal, PQ H3A 1B1, Canada
[2] Quebec Ctr Biodivers Sci, 1205 Dr Penfield Ave, Montreal, PQ H3A 1B1, Canada
[3] Grp Earth Observat Biodivers Observat Network, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Brock Univ, Environm Sustainabil Res Ctr, St Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, 25 Willcocks St, Toronto, ON M5S 3B2, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Ecosystem services monitoring; Interoperability; Ontology; Semantics; Ecosystem service conceptualisation; NATURES CONTRIBUTIONS; CLASSIFICATION; FRAMEWORK; ECOLOGY; BIODIVERSITY; EVOLUTION; DEMAND;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101726
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Ecosystem services (ES) are an important part of global and national environmental policies. In this context, there is a call for the monitoring of ES to support their management. However, the proliferation of terms used within ES science is a barrier to standardised monitoring. Monitoring ES requires knowing exactly what variables to measure and how they relate to change in the states of ES. It further requires interoperability between methodologies used by information systems to operationalise data flows. Here, we aim to systematise the language used to define ES and the terminology used in their monitoring by developing an ontology for ES monitoring. Ontologies are tools that operationalise concepts and the relationships among terms used to define them. An ontology allows people and machines to use terms consistently. Building on advances in other disciplines, the ES monitoring ontology systematises the language of ES across major conceptual frameworks advancing conceptual clarity and operationalisation of ES. We test the ES monitoring ontology with data from three ES in British Columbia, Canada, to highlight how it can enable information sharing and monitoring. We show that the ontology can organise and retrieve information and data for ES monitoring in a systematic way. Our work contributes to advancing interoperability of ES, taking a step towards systematically understanding ES change with automated tools. We invite members of the ES community to join the effort of developing this ontology for ES so that can it contribute to the challenge of systematically monitoring change in social-ecological systems.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 136 条
  • [1] Ecosystem services as a boundary object for sustainability
    Abson, D. J.
    von Wehrden, H.
    Baumgaertner, S.
    Fischer, J.
    Hanspach, J.
    Haerdtle, W.
    Heinrichs, H.
    Klein, A. M.
    Lang, D. J.
    Martens, P.
    Walmsley, D.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 103 : 29 - 37
  • [2] Adamo G., 2024, Ontology of Descriptions and Observations for Integrated Modelling (ODO-IM)'
  • [3] Conceptual Integration for Social-Ecological Systems An Ontological Approach
    Adamo, Greta
    Willis, Max
    [J]. RESEARCH CHALLENGES IN INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2022, 446 : 321 - 337
  • [4] Progress in developing and operationalizing the Monitoring Framework of the Global Biodiversity Framework
    Affinito, Flavio
    Williams, James M.
    Campbell, Jillian E.
    Londono, Maria C.
    Gonzalez, Andrew
    [J]. NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2024, 8 (12): : 2163 - 2171
  • [5] Navigating pluralism: Understanding perceptions of the ecosystem services concept
    Ainscough, Jacob
    Lentsch, Aster de Vries
    Metzger, Marc
    Rounsevell, Mark
    Schroeter, Matthias
    Delbaere, Ben
    de Groot, Rudolf
    Staes, Jan
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2019, 36
  • [6] Automatic ontology construction from text: a review from shallow to deep learning trend
    Al-Aswadi, Fatima N.
    Chan, Huah Yong
    Gan, Keng Hoon
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 2020, 53 (06) : 3901 - 3928
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2006, Nucleic Acids Res, DOI DOI 10.1093/NAR/GKJ021
  • [8] Arp R, 2015, BUILDING ONTOLOGIES WITH BASIC FORMAL ONTOLOGY, P1
  • [9] Ayuningsih F., 2019, Ontology Development for Ecosystem Services
  • [10] Interoperability for ecosystem service assessments: Why, how, who, and for whom?
    Bagstad, Kenneth J.
    Balbi, Stefano
    Adamo, Greta
    Athanasiadis, Ioannis N.
    Affinito, Flavio
    Willcock, Simon
    Magrach, Ainhoa
    Hayashi, Kiichiro
    V. Harmackova, Zuzana
    Niamir, Aidin
    Smets, Bruno
    Buchhorn, Marcel
    Drakou, Evangelina G.
    Alfieri, Alessandra
    Edens, Bram
    Morales, Luis Gonzalez
    Vari, Agnes
    Sanz, Maria-Jose
    Villa, Ferdinando
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2025, 72