How should work-integrated learning supervisors support their students? A concurrent triangulated mixed-method study

被引:1
作者
Drewery, David [1 ]
Truong, My [1 ]
Fannon, Anne-Marie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Work Learn Inst, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
关键词
Importance-performance analysis; supervision; supervisory support; work-integrated learning; co-operative education; PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT; MEANINGFUL WORK; PERFORMANCE; WORKPLACE; FEEDBACK; QUALITY; ROLES;
D O I
10.1080/07294360.2025.2486178
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Supervisor support is essential to the success of work-integrated learning (WIL) experiences, yet previous research suggests supervisors need more practical guidance on supporting students. This paper aims to identify the areas of supervisor support that need the most improvement through a concurrent triangulated mixed-method research design. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected via an online cross-sectional survey of co-operative education students (N = 323). Quantitative data were analyzed through importance-performance (IP) analysis and qualitative data were thematically analyzed to confirm and elaborate on the quantitative findings. The study revealed gaps between the support students want to receive and the support that supervisors offer, the largest gap concerning constructive feedback. The findings coalesced into a conceptual model of supervisor support called the 4C Model, an acronym that represents four ways supervisors should support their students: create meaningful work, communicate regularly and effectively, connect students to the organization, and care about students. The model will help WIL practitioners educate supervisors about how best to support students.
引用
收藏
页码:1094 / 1110
页数:17
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Ademuyiwa I, 2023, INT J WORK-INTEGR L, V24, P293
[2]   Does meaningful work encompass support towards supervisory, worker and engagement relationship? [J].
Ahmed, Umair ;
Yong, Irene Seok-Ching ;
Pahi, Munwar Hussain ;
Dakhan, Sarfraz Ahmed .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2022, 71 (08) :3704-3723
[3]  
Ali AA, 2022, INT J WORK-INTEGR L, V23, P335
[4]   Outcomes of Meaningful Work: A Meta-Analysis [J].
Allan, Blake A. ;
Batz-Barbarich, Cassondra ;
Sterling, Haley M. ;
Tay, Louis .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2019, 56 (03) :500-528
[5]   A Review of the Empirical Literature on Meaningful Work: Progress and Research Agenda [J].
Bailey, Catherine ;
Yeoman, Ruth ;
Madden, Adrian ;
Thompson, Marc ;
Kerridge, Gary .
HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, 2019, 18 (01) :83-113
[6]  
Brewer M, 2021, INT J WORK-INTEGR L, V22, P149
[7]   Supervising the PhD: identifying common mismatches in expectations between candidate and supervisor to improve research training outcomes [J].
Cardilini, Adam P. A. ;
Risely, Alice ;
Richardson, Mark F. .
HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 41 (03) :613-627
[8]   On a Wing and a Prayer! An Exploration of Students' Experiences of External Supervision [J].
Cleak, Helen ;
Zuchowski, Ines ;
Cleaver, Mark .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2022, 52 (01) :217-235
[9]   Empirical Support and Considerations for Social Work Supervision of Students in Alternative Placement Models [J].
Cleak, Helen ;
Zuchowski, Ines .
CLINICAL SOCIAL WORK JOURNAL, 2019, 47 (01) :32-42
[10]  
Creswell J. W., 2015, Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research, DOI DOI 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000250