Readability of health research informed consent forms: case of the National Health Research Ethics Committee in Tanzania

被引:0
作者
Kato, Renatha [1 ]
Joseph, Renatha [2 ]
Haule, Lazaro [2 ]
Kafuye, Mwanaidi [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Med Res, 3 Barack Obama Dr,POB 9653, Dar Es Salaam 11101, Tanzania
[2] Muhimbili Univ Hlth & Allied Sci, Sch Publ Hlth & Social Sci, Dept Bioeth & Hlth Professionalism, POB 65001, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania
来源
BMC MEDICAL ETHICS | 2025年 / 26卷 / 01期
关键词
Informed consent form; Health; Readability; Research; CLINICAL-TRIALS;
D O I
10.1186/s12910-025-01200-w
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Obtaining informed consent is the practice of respect for persons that gives the right to participants to make autonomous decisions about research participation. The difficult-to-read research informed consent forms (RICFs) hinder comprehension and can expose participants to harm. This study aims to assess the readability of health RICFs for studies approved by the National Health Research Ethics Committee (NatHREC) in Tanzania. Methods We used a retrospective cross-sectional study design. A total of 266 RICFs were sampled from the NatHREC database using stratified and systematic random sampling strategies. The readability of RICFs was assessed using the Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) and Flesch-Kincaid Readability Grade Level (FKRGL) formulas available in Microsoft Word Office and by manual check. Data were collected using the assessment checklist, analyzed, and presented with SPSS and MS Excel software. Results Out of 266 RICFs assessed, 65.4% had the recommended page numbers, 81.6% had longer sentences, and 80.5% were difficult to read, necessitating a person to acquire a US grade 10 (Form Four educational level in Tanzania) to understand the presented information. Pearson's correlation coefficient with p-values of < 0.001 and 95% confidence level disclosed that sentence lengths in the RICFs had a statistical association with the difficult reading levels obtained. Conclusion Findings from this study showed that most of the RICFs were concise in terms of page numbers and word count but had long and difficult sentences. Researchers should assess the readability of RICFs before submitting them for ethical approval. Research Ethics Committees (RECs) should consider inclusion of RICFs readability measurements in the Ethics Guidelines for Health Research. The study recommends further studies to assess the Kiswahili versions of RICFs to determine if the results obtained in this study apply to Kiswahili texts.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1979, Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for Protecting Human Subjects of Research
  • [2] CIOMS, 2016, Biomedical Research, P1
  • [3] Demuyakor J, 2021, theijhss, DOI [10.24940/theijhss/2021/v9/i1/157546-387779-1-SM, DOI 10.24940/THEIJHSS/2021/V9/I1/157546-387779-1-SM]
  • [4] Assessment of Length and Readability of Informed Consent Documents for COVID-19 Vaccine Trials
    Emanuel, Ezekiel J.
    Boyle, Connor W.
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2021, 4 (04)
  • [5] Communications in the time of a pandemic: the readability of documents for public consumption
    Ferguson, Catherine
    Merga, Margaret
    Winn, Stephen
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 45 (02) : 116 - 121
  • [6] Fischer AE, 2021, SAMJ S AFR MED J, V111, P180, DOI [10.7196/SAMJ.2021.v111i2.14752, 10.7196/samj.2021.v111i2.14752]
  • [7] Flesch Reading Ease, Score Is It Still Relevant in 2024-Rock Content Internet
  • [8] Hadden KB, 2017, J CLIN TRANSL SCI, V1, P361, DOI 10.1017/cts.2017.312
  • [9] Readability of patient information and consent documents in rheumatological studies
    Hamnes, Bente
    van Eijk-Hustings, Yvonne
    Primdahl, Jette
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2016, 17
  • [10] Heslinga V., 2013, Theory Pract Lang Stud, V3, P1497