Neglected giant bladder stone with bilateral ureteral stones: A case report of staged surgical treatment

被引:0
作者
Aji, Iwan Purnomo [1 ]
Renaldo, Johan [1 ]
Andhika, Dimas Panca [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Airlangga, Dr Soetomo Gen Acad Hosp, Fac Med, Dept Urol, Surabaya, Indonesia
[2] Univ Airlangga Teaching Hosp, Dept Urol, Surabaya, Indonesia
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY CASE REPORTS | 2025年 / 128卷
关键词
Giant bladder stone; Ureteral stone; Hydronephrosis; Vesicolithotomy; Ureteroscopy; Staged surgery; GUIDELINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijscr.2025.110933
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction and importance: A giant bladder stone is a rare urological condition in which a massive stone forms due to various contributing factors. We present a rare case of a giant bladder stone with concurrent ureteral stones, detailing its staged surgical management and relevant literature. Case presentation: A 44-year-old male presented with right flank, left flank, and suprapubic pain for one month prior to admission, accompanied by dysuria and a history of stones passage through the urinary tract. On examination, the patient presented with suprapubic pain, and laboratory results revealed severe anemia with elevated blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and serum creatinine levels. A vesicolithotomy was performed, followed by ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URS) one month later. A 15 x 10 cm bladder stone was found during the first surgery, and multiple ureteral stones were discovered during the second surgery. After surgery, the patient improved BUN (93.5 mg/dL to 27.6 mg/dL), serum creatinine (8.11 mg/dL to 1.85 mg/dL), and reduced flank and suprapubic pain. Clinical discussion: The management of giant bladder stones involves open vesicolithotomy, which is considered the gold standard for complete removal, as AUA and EAU guidelines recommend. A subsequent URS for the removal of bilateral ureteral stones provides a favorable outcome for the patient. Conclusion: A holistic approach for giant bladder stones is required, encompassing diagnosis and surgical planning to minimize misdiagnosis and complications. A staged surgical approach, including vesicolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy, may be beneficial.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Napitupulu T., Susanto M., Duma G., Rahman E.Y., Giant bladder stone: a case report and literature review, JMA J., 5, pp. 384-388, (2022)
  • [2] Katsimperis S., Pikramens K., Livadas K., Chatzikrachtis C., Bellos T., Giant bladder stone: a case report, Hinyokika Kiyo, 46, pp. 37-40, (2022)
  • [3] Franco-Gonzalez C.D., Martin-Millet J.A., Gonzalez-Guillermo C.A., Mendez-Atoche M., Caballero-Osorno P., Flores-Tapia J.P., A case report and literature review of a giant bladder stone in a 43-year-old female (9 x 8 x 4 cm, 250g), Radiol. Case Rep., 19, pp. 5539-5543, (2024)
  • [4] Wei X., Qin Y., Wang X., Qian J., Niu S., Tu S., Et al., Giant bladder stone: a case report, Exp. Ther. Med., 24, (2022)
  • [5] Pires J.C.C., de Brito B.B., de Melo F.F., Souza C.L., Oliveira M.V., Giant urinary bladder stone in a middle-aged male, EMJ Urol., (2022)
  • [6] Chakit M., Aqira A., Mesfioui A., A case report of a giant bladder stone (12 × 8 cm, 610 g), Radiol. Case Rep., 19, pp. 970-973, (2024)
  • [7] Skolarikos A., Jung H., Neisius A., Petrik A., Somani B., Tailly T., Et al., Urolithiasis EAU Guidelines on, (2024)
  • [8] Sohrabi C., Mathew G., Maria N., Kerwan A., Franchi T., Agha R.A., The SCARE 2023 guideline: updating consensus Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) guidelines, Int. J. Surg. (London, England), 109, 5, (2023)
  • [9] Agha R.A., Fowler A.J., Rajmohan S., Barai I., Orgill D.P., Afifi R., Et al., Preferred reporting of case series in surgery
  • [10] the PROCESS guidelines, Int. J. Surg., 36, pp. 319-323, (2016)