Comparing Safety Profiles of Skin-Sparing and Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Retrospective Analysis

被引:0
作者
Blazel, Madeleine M. [1 ]
Quick, Joseph D. [1 ]
Schafer, Rachel E. [1 ]
Shukla, Priya [1 ]
Wu, Shannon S. [2 ]
Bernard, Steven [3 ]
Schwarz, Graham [3 ]
Djohan, Risal [3 ]
Gurunian, Raffi [4 ]
Bishop, Sarah N. [3 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Lerner Coll Med, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Palo Alto, CA USA
[3] Cleveland Clin, Dept Plast Surg, Cleveland, OH USA
[4] Cleveland Clin, Dept Plast Surg, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
关键词
autologous reconstruction; DIEP reconstruction; nipple-sparing mastectomy; skin-sparing mastectomy; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; COMPLICATIONS; OUTCOMES; CANCER;
D O I
10.1002/micr.31256
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Mastectomy is performed prior to or concurrently with deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction. However, the complication rates of nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) versus skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) with DIEP are not well-characterized. Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent SSM or NSM with DIEP reconstruction between January 2019 and July 2022 at an academic institution. The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative complication rate. Variables were compared using Student's t-tests/Wilcoxon rank-sum and Chi-square/Fisher's exact tests. Results: Of 535 patients, 195 (36%) underwent NSM and 340 (64%) underwent SSM. The 30-day postoperative complication rates did not differ between cohorts (16.4% in NSM vs. 16.8% in SSM, p > 0.9). The NSM cohort had a higher rate of any flap necrosis (9.2% vs. 3.5%, p = 0.01) compared to the SSM cohort, though rates of total DIEP flap loss rate did not differ (4.1% vs. 1.5% respectively). Site-wide total DIEP flap loss was 2.4%. The NSM cohort had smaller preoperative sternal notch-to-nipple distances (25.0 vs. 26.5 cm, p < 0.001) and had lower rates of preoperative radiation therapy (28.2% vs. 42.9%, p < 0.002) compared to the SSM cohort. The cohorts did not differ in demographic or operative variables including reconstruction timing (delayed vs. immediate interval), readmission, and reoperation. Conclusions: Individuals who received an NSM prior to DIEP reconstruction had more flap complications compared to the SSM cohort. Both cohorts had comparable overall 30-day postoperative complication rates and demographic variables, and rate of total DIEP flap loss was 2.4%. Patient preference can further guide surgical decision-making.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Systematic review of therapeutic nipple-sparing versus skin-sparing mastectomy [J].
Agha, R. A. ;
Al Omran, Y. ;
Wellstead, G. ;
Sagoo, H. ;
Barai, I ;
Rajmohan, S. ;
Borrelli, M. R. ;
Vella-Baldacchino, M. ;
Orgill, D. P. ;
Rusby, J. E. .
BJS OPEN, 2019, 3 (02) :135-145
[2]   Quality-of-Life Outcomes Improve with Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction [J].
Bailey, Christopher R. ;
Ogbuagu, Onyebuchi ;
Baltodano, Pablo A. ;
Simjee, Usamah F. ;
Manahan, Michele A. ;
Cooney, Damon S. ;
Jacobs, Lisa K. ;
Tsangaris, Theodore N. ;
Cooney, Carisa M. ;
Rosson, Gedge D. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 140 (02) :219-226
[3]   Comparison of 2-Year Complication Rates Among Common Techniques for Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction [J].
Bennett, Katelyn G. ;
Qi, Ji ;
Kim, Hyungjin M. ;
Hamill, Jennifer B. ;
Pusic, Andrea L. ;
Wilkins, Edwin G. .
JAMA SURGERY, 2018, 153 (10) :901-908
[4]   Complications following immediate compared to delayed deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstructions [J].
Beugels, J. ;
Bod, L. ;
van Kuijk, S. M. J. ;
Qiu, S. S. ;
Tuinder, S. M. H. ;
Heuts, E. M. ;
Piatkowski, A. ;
van der Hulst, R. R. W. J. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2018, 169 (02) :349-357
[5]   Complications in unilateral versus bilateral deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstructions: A multicentre study [J].
Beugels, J. ;
Hoekstra, L. T. ;
Tuinder, S. M. H. ;
Heuts, E. M. ;
van der Hulst, R. R. W. J. ;
Piatkowski, A. A. .
JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2016, 69 (09) :1291-1298
[6]   Quality of Life and Complications after Nipple- versus Skin-Sparing Mastectomy followed by Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Clarijs, Marloes E. ;
Peeters, Noelle J. M. C. Vrancken ;
van Dongen, Sophie A. F. ;
Koppert, Linetta B. ;
Pusic, Andrea L. ;
Mureau, Marc A. M. ;
Rijken, Bianca F. M. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2023, 152 (01) :12E-24E
[7]   Current perspectives on radiation therapy in autologous and prosthetic breast reconstruction [J].
Clemens, Mark W. ;
Kronowitz, Steven J. .
GLAND SURGERY, 2015, 4 (03) :222-231
[8]   Buried Autologous Breast Reconstruction: Outcomes and Technical Considerations [J].
Creasy, Henrietta ;
Citron, Isabelle ;
Davis, Timothy P. ;
Cooper, Lilli ;
Din, Asmat H. ;
Rose, Victoria .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (05)
[9]   Breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps [J].
Cubitt, J. ;
Barber, Z. ;
Khan, A. A. ;
Tyler, M. .
ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2012, 94 (08) :552-558
[10]   Overall Survival, Disease-Free Survival, Local Recurrence, and Nipple-Areolar Recurrence in the Setting of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review [J].
De La Cruz, Lucy ;
Moody, Alison M. ;
Tappy, Erryn E. ;
Blankenship, Stephanie A. ;
Hecht, Eric M. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 22 (10) :3241-3249