Religion and Philosophy in the Work of Paul Ricoeur

How to understand the fact that Ric oe ur 's philosophy, which aims to << understand everything, even religion >> (Lachelier), did not give rise to a philosophy of religion strictly speaking? This study proposes an explanatory hypothesis: Ric oe ur attempted to secularize his religious convictions within his philosophy, so as to propose a form of philosophical approximation of religion, to finally claim a philosophy without absolutes, contiguous with biblical hermeneutics.