The Clinical Utility of Targeted Heart Rate Control in Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials with Trial Sequential Analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Datta, Priyankar K.
Sathe, Prachee
Roy, Avishek
Baronia, Tanima
Bhattacharjee, Anirban
Kundu, Riddhi [1 ]
机构
[1] Ruby Hall Hosp, Dept Crit Care Med, Pune, Maharashtra, India
关键词
Beta-blockers; Heart rate control; Ivabradine; Septic shock; SEPSIS; ESMOLOL; DYSFUNCTION;
D O I
10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24849
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives: Heart rate control using beta-blockers in sepsis has traditionally been avoided because of concerns with worsening cardiac index and organ perfusion. Recent studies has explored the possible beneficial effects of targeted heart rate control in patients with septic shock who have tachycardia despite initial resuscitation. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the effects of heart rate control in septic shock patients. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted searching for studies from PubMed, Cochrane Central, and Embase registers for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the mortality of patients with sepsis and septic shock treated with targeted rate control. The literature search was done to include studies from January 2013 to December 2023. Two independent researchers independently assessed the studies and included RCTS in which adult patients (>18 years of age) with septic shock were treated with targeted heart rate control vs placebo after initial resuscitation due to persistent tachycardia. The study data was extracted by two independent researchers. A random effects model was used to present the results. A trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed for the primary outcome of 28-day mortality. Results: A total of 9 studies with a pooled sample size of 807 participants were included in the analysis. Eight of the included studies with a pooled sample size of 766 reported 28-day mortality. Targeted heart rate control was associated with a trend toward lower 28-day mortality [risk ratio (RR): 0.78; 95% CI: 0.62-0.99; p = 0.04; I2 = 48%]. Trial sequential analysis showed the cumulative effect lying within the zone of uncertainty, with diversity-adjusted required information size of 1,756 and pooled effect size of the pooled RR 0.78 (alpha-spending adjusted 95% CI: 0.53-1.15). There was a statistically significant lower heart rate associated with rate control (MD: -16.66; 95% CI: -23.89 to -9.42; p-value < 0.001) but no difference in mean arterial pressure. cardiac index, lactate levels, norepinephrine (NE) requirements, and ICU length of stay (LOS) in between the groups. Conclusion: Targeted heart rate control in patients with septic shock may be tolerated from a hemodynamic standpoint. However, the beneficial effect on mortality is less certain than was reported in the initial studies.
引用
收藏
页码:1170 / 1179
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The concomitant use of ultra short beta-blockers with vasopressors and inotropes in critically ill patients with septic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Al Sulaiman, Khalid
    Alkofide, Hadeel A.
    AlFaifi, Mashael E.
    Aljohani, Sarah S.
    Al Harthi, Abdullah F.
    Alqahtani, Rahaf A.
    Alanazi, Ashwaq M.
    Nazer, Lama H.
    Al Shaya, Abdulrahman I.
    Aljuhani, Ohoud
    SAUDI PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 32 (06)
  • [22] Effect of Low-Dose Hydrocortisone Therapy in Adult Patients With Septic Shock: A Meta-Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Lyu, Qing-Quan
    Chen, Qi-Hong
    Zheng, Rui-Qiang
    Yu, Jiang-Quan
    Gu, Xiao-Hua
    JOURNAL OF INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 35 (10) : 971 - 983
  • [23] HYDROCORTISONE COMBINED WITH VITAMIN C AND THIAMINE IN THE TREATMENT OF SEPSIS/SEPTIC SHOCK: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW WITH META-ANALYSIS AND TRIAL SEQUENTIAL ANALYSIS
    Lu, Difan
    Mao, Wenchao
    CLINICAL AND INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2023, 46 (01): : E36 - E49
  • [24] Quinolones for sepsis. A protocol for a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
    Korang, Steven Kwasi
    Maagaard, Mathias
    Feinberg, Joshua
    Perner, Anders
    Gluud, Christian
    Jakobsen, Janus C.
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2019, 63 (08) : 1113 - 1123
  • [25] Resuscitation Fluids in Septic Shock: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Li, Binghu
    Zhao, Hongliang
    Zhang, Jie
    Yan, Qingguang
    Li, Tao
    Liu, Liangming
    SHOCK, 2020, 53 (06): : 679 - 685
  • [26] Non-catecholamine vasopressors in the treatment of adult patients with septic shock-evidence from meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials
    Zhong, Lei
    Ji, Xiao-Wei
    Wang, Hai-Li
    Zhao, Guang-Ming
    Zhou, Qing
    Xie, Bo
    JOURNAL OF INTENSIVE CARE, 2020, 8 (01)
  • [27] Efficacy of esmolol for septic shock and sepsis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies
    Shi, Kaishun
    Hu, Yaoren
    Huang, Jie
    Chen, Yan
    Shen, Qiang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2018, 11 (11): : 11458 - 11464
  • [28] Early outcome of early-goal directed therapy for patients with sepsis or septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Chen, Xiaofan
    Zhu, Weifeng
    Tan, Jing
    Nie, Heyun
    Liu, Liangming
    Yan, Dongmei
    Zhou, Xu
    Sun, Xin
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (16) : 27510 - 27519
  • [29] Balanced Salt Solution Versus Normal Saline as Resuscitation Fluid in Pediatric Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Chandelia, Sudha
    Angurana, Suresh Kumar
    Prasad, Shankar
    Tiwari, Mithlesh Kumar
    Jayashree, Muralidharan
    Nallasamy, Karthi
    Bansal, Arun
    JOURNAL OF INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2025,
  • [30] Comparative efficacy of Chinese tonic medicines for treating sepsis or septic shock: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Yang, Rui
    Hu, Cheng
    Zhuo, Yuxin
    Tan, Qingyuan
    Shen, Yuxin
    Jiang, Kun
    Xia, Qing
    Deng, Lihui
    PHYTOMEDICINE, 2025, 136