Externally validated clinical prediction models for estimating treatment outcomes for patients with a mood, anxiety or psychotic disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Burghoorn, Desi G. [1 ]
Booij, Sanne H. [1 ]
Schoevers, Robert A. [1 ]
Riese, Harriette [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Interdisciplinary Ctr Psychopathol & Emot Regulat, Dept Psychiat, Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
Anxiety or fear-related disorders; depressive disorders; psychotic disorders/schizophrenia; systematic review; meta-analysis; RISK CALCULATOR; DEPRESSION; ALGORITHM; TOOL;
D O I
10.1192/bjo.2024.789
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background Suboptimal treatment outcomes contribute to the high disease burden of mood, anxiety or psychotic disorders. Clinical prediction models could optimise treatment allocation, which may result in better outcomes. Whereas ample research on prediction models is performed, model performance in other clinical contexts (i.e. external validation) is rarely examined. This gap hampers generalisability and as such implementation in clinical practice.Aims Systematically appraise studies on externally validated clinical prediction models for estimated treatment outcomes for mood, anxiety and psychotic disorders by (1) reviewing methodological quality and applicability of studies and (2) investigating how model properties relate to differences in model performance.Method The review and meta-analysis protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (registration number CRD42022307987). A search was conducted on 8 November 2021 in the databases PubMED, PsycINFO and EMBASE. Random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression were conducted to examine between-study heterogeneity in discriminative performance and its relevant influencing factors.Results Twenty-eight studies were included. The majority of studies (n = 16) validated models for mood disorders. Clinical predictors (e.g. symptom severity) were most frequently included (n = 25). Low methodological and applicability concerns were found for two studies. The overall discrimination performance of the meta-analysis was fair with wide prediction intervals (0.72 [0.46; 0.89]). The between-study heterogeneity was not explained by number or type of predictors but by disorder diagnosis.Conclusions Few models seem ready for further implementation in clinical practice to aid treatment allocation. Besides the need for more external validation studies, we recommend close examination of the clinical setting before model implementation.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Brain markers predicting response to cognitive-behavioral therapy for social anxiety disorder: an independent replication of Whitfield-Gabrieli et al. 2015 [J].
Ashar, Yoni K. ;
Clark, Joseph ;
Gunning, Faith M. ;
Goldin, Philippe ;
Gross, James J. ;
Wager, Tor D. .
TRANSLATIONAL PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 11 (01)
[2]   Prediction of short-term antidepressant response using probabilistic graphical models with replication across multiple drugs and treatment settings [J].
Athreya, Arjun P. ;
Bruckl, Tanja ;
Binder, Elisabeth B. ;
Rush, A. John ;
Biernacka, Joanna ;
Frye, Mark A. ;
Neavin, Drew ;
Skime, Michelle ;
Monrad, Ditlev ;
Iyer, Ravishankar K. ;
Mayes, Taryn ;
Trivedi, Madhukar ;
Carter, Rickey E. ;
Wang, Liewei ;
Weinshilboum, Richard M. ;
Croarkin, Paul E. ;
Bobo, William, V .
NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 46 (07) :1272-1282
[3]   Pharmacogenomics-Driven Prediction of Antidepressant Treatment Outcomes: A Machine-Learning Approach With Multi-trial Replication [J].
Athreya, Arjun P. ;
Neavin, Drew ;
Carrillo-Roa, Tania ;
Skime, Michelle ;
Biernacka, Joanna ;
Frye, Mark A. ;
Rush, A. John ;
Wang, Liewei ;
Binder, Elisabeth B. ;
Iyer, Ravishankar K. ;
Weinshilboum, Richard M. ;
Bobo, William V. .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2019, 106 (04) :855-865
[4]  
Bashmi L, 2023, Atlas of psychiatry, P57
[5]  
Bone C, 2021, LANCET DIGIT HEALTH, V3, pE231, DOI 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00018-2
[6]   Variability in the analysis of a single neuroimaging dataset by many teams [J].
Botvinik-Nezer, Rotem ;
Holzmeister, Felix ;
Camerer, Colin F. ;
Dreber, Anna ;
Huber, Juergen ;
Johannesson, Magnus ;
Kirchler, Michael ;
Iwanir, Roni ;
Mumford, Jeanette A. ;
Adcock, R. Alison ;
Avesani, Paolo ;
Baczkowski, Blazej M. ;
Bajracharya, Aahana ;
Bakst, Leah ;
Ball, Sheryl ;
Barilari, Marco ;
Bault, Nadege ;
Beaton, Derek ;
Beitner, Julia ;
Benoit, Roland G. ;
Berkers, Ruud M. W. J. ;
Bhanji, Jamil P. ;
Biswal, Bharat B. ;
Bobadilla-Suarez, Sebastian ;
Bortolini, Tiago ;
Bottenhorn, Katherine L. ;
Bowring, Alexander ;
Braem, Senne ;
Brooks, Hayley R. ;
Brudner, Emily G. ;
Calderon, Cristian B. ;
Camilleri, Julia A. ;
Castrellon, Jaime J. ;
Cecchetti, Luca ;
Cieslik, Edna C. ;
Cole, Zachary J. ;
Collignon, Olivier ;
Cox, Robert W. ;
Cunningham, William A. ;
Czoschke, Stefan ;
Dadi, Kamalaker ;
Davis, Charles P. ;
Luca, Alberto De ;
Delgado, Mauricio R. ;
Demetriou, Lysia ;
Dennison, Jeffrey B. ;
Di, Xin ;
Dickie, Erin W. ;
Dobryakova, Ekaterina ;
Donnat, Claire L. .
NATURE, 2020, 582 (7810) :84-+
[7]  
Bourke JW., 2012, Kumar Clark's Clinical Medicine, P1115
[8]  
Bourton I., 2022, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Ved. 6.3.
[9]   The use of the area under the roc curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms [J].
Bradley, AP .
PATTERN RECOGNITION, 1997, 30 (07) :1145-1159
[10]   Deep ROC Analysis and AUC as Balanced Average Accuracy, for Improved Classifier Selection, Audit and Explanation [J].
Carrington, Andre M. ;
Manuel, Douglas G. ;
Fieguth, Paul W. ;
Ramsay, Tim ;
Osmani, Venet ;
Wernly, Bernhard ;
Bennett, Carol ;
Hawken, Steven ;
Magwood, Olivia ;
Sheikh, Yusuf ;
McInnes, Matthew ;
Holzinger, Andreas .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2023, 45 (01) :329-341