The main predictors of well-being and productivity from a gender perspective

被引:0
作者
Martinez-Martinez, Kevin [1 ]
Llorens, Susana [1 ]
Cruz-Ortiz, Valeria [1 ]
Reyes-Lujan, Juanjo [1 ]
Salanova, Marisa [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jaume 1, Dept Social Psychol, WANT Res Team, Castellon de La Plana, Spain
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2024年 / 15卷
关键词
gender; resources; demands; practices; well-being; performance; OF-FIT INDEXES; JOB DEMANDS; SOCIAL SUPPORT; WORK; RESOURCES; PERFORMANCE; ENGAGEMENT; MEN; CHALLENGE; HINDRANCE;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1478826
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Introduction: Gender difference management is one of the most challenging dimensions organizations must cope with to adapt to VUCA (Volatile, Uncertain, Complex and Ambiguous) environments. The aim of this study is to identify the main drivers (i.e., most influential job resources, job demands, and organizational practices) of healthy employees and organizational outcomes assessing the differences between men and women, based on the HERO (HEalthy and Resilient Organization) Model. Methods: Data were collected through the HERO-CHECK Questionnaire: job demands (e.g., quantitative overload), job (e.g., team coordination) and personal resources (e.g., emotional competence), healthy organizational practices (e.g., work-family balance practices), healthy employees (e.g., work engagement) and healthy organizational outcomes (e.g., in-role performance). The sample consisted of 2,128 professionals (70% female) from 8 organizations. Gender-based multigroup SEM was performed using R 4.1.2. Results: Results of the multigroup SEM analysis show a good fit of the HERO model and support the existence of configural invariance among gender groups. This research shows that women perceive more resources to cope with demands, in consequence, they perceive more well-being and better job performance. Regardless of gender, coordination, horizontal trust, vertical trust, and emotional competence stand as relevant resources for achieving healthy employees and healthy organizational outcomes. However, there are gender-specific predictors of healthy employees and healthy organizational outcomes, depending on gender. Discussion: Based on these results, gender-related recommendations for promoting specific resources (e.g., autonomy in women) and preventing specific demands (e.g., mobbing in men) may be suggested in organizational contexts.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 82 条
  • [11] Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance
    Chen, Fang Fang
    [J]. STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2007, 14 (03) : 464 - 504
  • [12] Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance
    Cheung, GW
    Rensvold, RB
    [J]. STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2002, 9 (02) : 233 - 255
  • [13] Cifre E., 2011, Gestion Practica de Riesgos Laborales, V82, P28
  • [14] Cifre E., 2000, Rev. Psicol. Trabajo Organ, V16, P243
  • [15] Editorial: Psychosocial Risks and Health at Work From a Gender Perspective
    Cifre, Eva
    Vera, Maria
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 10
  • [16] Cobos D., 2020, Salud Trab, V28, P95
  • [17] Linking Job Demands and Resources to Employee Engagement and Burnout: A Theoretical Extension and Meta-Analytic Test
    Crawford, Eean R.
    LePine, Jeffery A.
    Rich, Bruce Louis
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 95 (05) : 834 - 848
  • [18] Receiving instrumental support at work: When help is not welcome
    Deelstra, JT
    Peeters, MCW
    Zijlstra, FRH
    Schaufeli, WB
    Stroebe, W
    van Doornen, LP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 88 (02) : 324 - 331
  • [19] The job demands-resources model of burnout
    Demerouti, E
    Bakker, AB
    Nachreiner, F
    Schaufeli, WB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 86 (03) : 499 - 512
  • [20] The relationship between job demands, resources and subjective wellbeing: The role of work-family conflict across the life course
    Dishon-Berkovits, Miriam
    Riva, Egidio
    Lucchini, Mario
    [J]. CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 43 (09) : 8085 - 8101