Use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in a multidisciplinary approach for management of traumatic haemorrhagic shock: 10-year retrospective experience from a French level 1 trauma centre

被引：0

作者：

Charbit, Jonathan ^{[1
]}

Dagod, Geoffrey ^{[1
]}

Darcourt, Simon ^{[1
]}

Margueritte, Emmanuel ^{[2
]}

Souche, Francois-Regis ^{[3
]}

Solovei, Laurence ^{[4
]}

Monnin-Barres, Valerie ^{[5
]}

Millet, Ingrid ^{[6
]}

Capdevila, Xavier ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Lapeyronie Univ Hosp, Trauma & Polyvalent Crit Care Unit, Montpellier, France

[2] Lapeyronie Univ Hosp, Med legal Dept, Montpellier, France

[3] St Eloi Univ Hosp, Abdominal & Gen Surg Dept, Montpellier, France

[4] Arnaud Devilleneuve Univ Hosp, Thorac & Vasc Surg Dept, Montpellier, France

[5] Arnaud Devilleneuve Univ Hosp, Intervent Radiol Dept, Montpellier, France

[6] Montpellier Univ Hosp, Montpellier, France

来源：

INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED | 2025年 / 56卷 / 01期

关键词：

Aortic occlusion; Bleeding source; Damage control; Haemorrhage control; Traumatic arrest; TIME; OPERATION; MORTALITY; SURVIVAL; DEVICE; MODEL;

D O I：

10.1016/j.injury.2024.111952

中图分类号：

R4 [临床医学];

学科分类号：

1002 ; 100602 ;

摘要：

Background: The present study investigated an institutional multidisciplinary strategy for managing traumatic haemorrhagic shock by integrating the placement of REBOA (resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta) by anaesthesiologist-intensivists. Methods: All severe trauma patients who received percutaneous REBOA placement between January 2013 and December 2022 in our level 1 trauma centre were retrospectively analysed. The data collected included the clinical context, indications and location of REBOA, durations of aortic occlusion (AO), choice of haemostatic procedures and surgical teams, and specific complications. Results: In total, 38 trauma patients were included in the present study (mean age = 41 years [standard deviation = 21 years], 31 [82 %] were male, and median injury severity score was 62.5 [inter-quartile range (IQR) = 45-75]). REBOA was always placed by anaesthesiologist-intensivists, who comprised 68 % of the senior physicians (13/19) in our trauma team over the period. Twenty-eight AOs (74 %) were performed in zone 1 and 10 (26 %) in zone 3. Twelve patients (32 %) received REBOA upon circulatory arrest. Routes following REBOA placement comprised: computed tomography scan = 47 %, operating room = 34 %, angiography = 3 %, emergency room thoracotomy = 5 %, and prematurely died = 11 %. Duration of AO was 38 min (IQR = 32-44 min) in zone 1 and 78 min (IQR = 48-112 min) in zone 3. Mortality rate was 66 % (95 % CI 51-81 %) and higher in cases of AO in zone 1 (79 % versus 30 %, p = 0.018) or concomitant with circulatory arrest (92 % versus 54 %, p = 0.047). No ischemic limb needed an intervention and three endothelial injuries required delayed endovascular stenting. Conclusions: Percutaneous REBOA placement by anaesthesiologist-intensivists included in the multidisciplinary management of traumatic haemorrhagic shock was associated with acceptable time of AO and local complications similar to those observed in other series.

引用

页数：9

共 29 条

[1]

Castellini G., Gianola S., Biffi A., Porcu G., Fabbri A., Ruggieri M.P., Et al., Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in patients with major trauma and uncontrolled haemorrhagic shock: a systematic review with meta-analysis, World J Emerg Surg, 16, (2021)

[2]

Avaro J.-P., Mardelle V., Roch A., Gil C., De Biasi C., Oliver M., Et al., Forty-Minute Endovascular Aortic Occlusion Increases Survival in an Experimental Model of Uncontrolled Hemorrhagic Shock Caused by Abdominal Trauma, J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care, 71, pp. 720-726, (2011)

[3]

Beyer C.A., Hoareau G.L., Kashtan H.W., Wishy A.M., Caples C., Spruce M., Et al., Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in a swine model of hemorrhagic shock and blunt thoracic injury, Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg, 46, pp. 1357-1366, (2020)

[4]

Abe T., Uchida M., Nagata I., Saitoh D., Tamiya N., Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta versus aortic cross clamping among patients with critical trauma: a nationwide cohort study in Japan, Crit Care, 20, (2016)

[5]

Brenner M., Zakhary B., Coimbra R., Morrison J., Scalea T., Moore L.J., Et al., Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) may be superior to resuscitative thoracotomy (RT) in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), Trauma Surg Acute Care Open, 7, (2022)

[6]

Cralley A.L., Vigneshwar N., Moore E.E., Dubose J., Brenner M.L., Sauaia A., Et al., Zone 1 Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta vs Resuscitative Thoracotomy for Patient Resuscitation After Severe Hemorrhagic Shock, JAMA Surg, 158, (2023)

[7]

Brenner M., Teeter W., Hoehn M., Pasley J., Hu P., Yang S., Et al., Use of Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta for Proximal Aortic Control in Patients With Severe Hemorrhage and Arrest, JAMA Surg, 153, (2018)

[8]

Jansen J.O., Cochran C., Boyers D., Gillies K., Lendrum R., Sadek S., Et al., The UK Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) Randomized Clinical Trial (the UK-REBOA trial): study Protocol, In Review, (2022)

[9]

Avaro J.P., Mardelle V., Roch A., Gil C., de Biasi C., Oliver M., Et al., Forty-minute endovascular aortic occlusion increases survival in an experimental model of uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock caused by abdominal trauma, J Trauma, 71, pp. 720-725, (2011)

[10]

Gauss T., Balandraud P., Frandon J., Abba J., Ageron F.X., Albaladejo P., Et al., Strategic proposal for a national trauma system in France, Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med, 38, pp. 121-130, (2019)

← 1 2 3 →