Examining Force Level Output of Skin-Drive Bone Conduction Hearing Devices in Adults With Simulated Conductive Hearing Loss

被引:0
|
作者
El-Naji, Rana [1 ,2 ]
Scollie, Susan [1 ,2 ]
Bagatto, Marlene [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Western Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Natl Ctr Audiol, London, ON, Canada
[2] Western Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Commun Sci & Disorders, London, ON, Canada
关键词
PREFERRED LISTENING LEVELS; PREDICTION; CHILDREN; TARGETS; SPEECH; AIDS; BAHA;
D O I
10.1044/2024_AJA-23-00258
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Purpose: Bone conduction hearing devices (BCDs) that deliver sound across the skin (i.e., transcutaneous) are suitable for some individuals who have conductive or mixed hearing losses. Prescriptive targets for percutaneous devices are available, for example, from the Desired Sensation Level-Bone Conduction Hearing Device (DSL-BCD) algorithm. These targets, however, may require modification for use with transcutaneous BCDs. The current study investigated three key variables that may inform target modification: (a) comparison of thresholds measured using an audiometric bone conduction (BC) transducer versus transcutaneous BCDs that offer in situ threshold measurement, (b) trans- cutaneous BCD default force level outputs versus recommended DSL percutaneous BC targets, and (c) the preferred listening levels (PLLs) of adults wearing transcutaneous BCDs in a laboratory setting. Method: Bilateral conductive hearing loss was simulated in 20 normal-hearing adults via earplugs. Thresholds were measured using a B-71 BC transducer and two commercially available BCDs coupled to a soft headband. DSL percutaneous BC targets were generated, and PLLs were obtained for a 60-dB SPL speech stimulus. Force level outputs were measured using a skull simulator on the Audioscan Verifit2 at the hearing aids' default settings and at the participants' PLL for each device. Results: On average, audiometric BC thresholds were significantly better than those measured in situ with each BCD. PLLs were similar to prescribed targets for one device with the smoother response shape and agreed in the high frequencies for both devices. Conclusions: In situ thresholds are significantly higher than audiometric BC thresholds, suggesting that device-based in situ measurement more accurately accounts for the signal transmission from transcutaneous BCDs. PLLs differed from the percutaneous targets and varied between devices, which may indicate that either target modifications or manipulations of device frequency response shaping are needed to approximate PLL with transcutaneous BCD devices.
引用
收藏
页码:695 / 704
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Bilateral Bone Conduction Devices: Improved Hearing Ability in Children With Bilateral Conductive Hearing Loss
    Dun, Catharina A. J.
    Agterberg, Martijn J. H.
    Cremers, Cor W. R. J.
    Hol, Myrthe K. S.
    Snik, Ad F. M.
    EAR AND HEARING, 2013, 34 (06) : 806 - 808
  • [2] Bilateral adhesive bone conduction devices in patients with congenital bilateral conductive hearing loss
    Liu, Yujie
    Wang, Yuan
    Yang, Lin
    Zhu, Jikai
    Wang, Danni
    Zhao, Shouqin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2023, 44 (04)
  • [3] Hearing in Noise With Unilateral Versus Bilateral Bone Conduction Hearing Aids in Adults With Pseudo-conductive Hearing Loss
    Hilly, Ohad
    Sokolov, Meirav
    Finkel, Reut Beck
    Zavdy, Ofir
    Shemesh, Rafael
    Attias, Joseph
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2020, 41 (03) : 379 - 385
  • [4] The outcomes of bilateral bone conduction hearing devices (BCHD) implantation in the treatment of hearing loss: A systematic review
    Heath, Ella
    Dawoud, Moustafa Mohamed
    Stavrakas, Marios
    Ray, Jaydip
    COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 23 (02) : 95 - 108
  • [5] Improved Binaural Hearing Effects and Sound Source Localization in Listeners with Simulated Unilateral Conductive Hearing Loss: Effect of a Bone Conduction Device
    Yu, Chongxian
    Wang, Wenqian
    Jiang, Yuan
    Zhang, Xiaoming
    Liu, Yanyan
    Wang, Ping
    Ni, Xin
    Zhong, Mei
    Liu, Yujie
    Liu, Yehai
    ENT-EAR NOSE & THROAT JOURNAL, 2024,
  • [6] Preoperative Headband Assessment for Semi-Implantable Bone Conduction Hearing Devices in Conductive Hearing Loss: Is it Useful or Misleading?
    Rainsbury, James W.
    Williams, Blair A.
    Gulliver, Mark
    Morris, David P.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2015, 36 (02) : e58 - e62
  • [7] Amplification of transcutaneous and percutaneous bone-conduction devices with a test-band in an induced model of conductive hearing loss
    Park, Marn Joon
    Lee, Jae Ryung
    Yang, Chan Joo
    Yoo, Myung Hoon
    Jin, In Suk
    Choi, Chi Ho
    Park, Hong Ju
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2016, 55 (11) : 653 - 657
  • [8] Comparison of Active Bone Conduction Hearing Implant Systems in Unilateral and Bilateral Conductive or Mixed Hearing Loss
    Canale, Andrea
    Urbanelli, Anastasia
    Gragnano, Maria
    Bordino, Valerio
    Albera, Andrea
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2023, 13 (08)
  • [9] The Merits of Bilateral Application of Bone-Conduction Devices in Children With Bilateral Conductive Hearing Loss
    den Besten, Chrisje A.
    Vogt, Katharina
    Bosman, Arjan J.
    Snik, Ad F. M.
    Hol, Myrthe K. S.
    Agterberg, Martijn J. H.
    EAR AND HEARING, 2020, 41 (05) : 1327 - 1332
  • [10] A new adhesive bone conduction hearing system effectively treats conductive hearing loss in children
    Neumann, Katrin
    Thomas, Jan Peter
    Voelter, Christiane
    Dazert, Stefan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2019, 122 : 117 - 125