Pragmatic Approaches to Team-Based Qualitative Analysis of Study Participants' Exit Interview Data in a Pragmatic Clinical Trial

被引:1
作者
Barnhill, Jessica L. [1 ]
Morone, Natalia E. [2 ]
Lathren, Christine [1 ]
Harr, Elondra [1 ]
Baez, Jose E. [2 ]
Rodriguez, Ruth [3 ]
Gardiner, Paula [3 ]
Greco, Carol M. [4 ,5 ]
Thomas, Holly N. [4 ,5 ]
Gaylord, Susan A. [1 ]
Roth, Isabel J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Boston Univ, Boston Med Ctr, Boston, MA USA
[3] Cambridge Hlth Alliance, Ctr Mindfulness & Compass, Cambridge, MA USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Hlth & Rehabil Sci, Pittsburgh, PA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
rapid qualitative analysis; pragmatic clinical trial; team science; mindfulness; chronic pain; qualitative methods; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1177/16094069251322321
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The OPTIMUM trial is a multisite pragmatic randomized clinical trial of an adapted Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) program for people with chronic low back pain in primary care settings provided via telehealth group medical visits. Researchers conducted fifty-nine exit interviews at the end of the intervention to inform the ongoing conduct of the trial and to better understand patients' experiences. This manuscript describes a pragmatic approach to the qualitative analysis of exit interviews within a pragmatic clinical trial. The analysis included three important pivots. First, researchers conducted a process evaluation using a rapid approach called the Lightning Report method. Second, team-based approaches to qualitative analysis were utilized to pair experienced and inexperienced qualitative researchers. Third, based upon principles from Big Qual methodology, a codebook was developed and applied to provide an aerial overview of the data in preparation for more in-depth exploration. Based upon these pivots, the process evaluation provided actionable results in a timely fashion, team members increased analytical skills, and multiple analyses are being applied to the data set. By describing the pragmatic decisions to pivot approaches to qualitative analysis, this manuscript contributes to existing literature regarding rapid qualitative analysis methods for process evaluation in pragmatic clinical trials, team-based mentorship in large trials, and applications from Big Qual for large data sets.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH, 2024, ATLAS.ti Mac (Version 24.1.0) [Computer program]
[2]  
Barnhill J., 2025, The hidden complexity of virtual mindfulness-based group medical visits: Comfort, challenge, and the influence of social determinants of health
[3]  
Braun V., 2019, HDB RES METHODS HLTH, P843, DOI [10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_103, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_103]
[4]   Big Qual: Defining and Debating Qualitative Inquiry for Large Data Sets [J].
Brower, Rebecca L. ;
Jones, Tamara Bertrand ;
Osborne-Lampkin, La'Tara ;
Hu, Shouping ;
Park-Gaghan, Toby J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2019, 18
[5]   The Stanford Lightning Report Method: A comparison of rapid qualitative synthesis results across four implementation evaluations [J].
Brown-Johnson, Cati ;
Safaeinili, Nadia ;
Zionts, Dani ;
Holdsworth, Laura M. ;
Shaw, Jonathan G. ;
Asch, Steven M. ;
Mahoney, Megan ;
Winget, Marcy .
LEARNING HEALTH SYSTEMS, 2020, 4 (02)
[6]   Making the most of big qualitative datasets: a living systematic review of analysis methods [J].
Chandrasekar, Abinaya ;
Clark, Sigrun Eyrunardottir ;
Martin, Sam ;
Vanderslott, Samantha ;
Flores, Elaine C. ;
Aceituno, David ;
Barnett, Phoebe ;
Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia ;
Juan, Norha Vera San .
FRONTIERS IN BIG DATA, 2024, 7
[7]  
Edwards R, 2021, QUAL QUANT, V55, P1275, DOI [10.1007/s11135-020-01054-x, 10.1007/s11135-020-01054-x, DOI 10.1007/S11135-020-01054-X]
[8]   Enhance your team-based qualitative research [J].
Fernald, DH ;
Duclos, CW .
ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2005, 3 (04) :360-364
[9]   Developing a codebook to guide content analysis of expressive writing transcripts [J].
Fonteyn, Marsha E. ;
Vettese, Margaret ;
Lancaster, Diane R. ;
Bauer-Wu, Susan .
APPLIED NURSING RESEARCH, 2008, 21 (03) :165-168
[10]   Process evaluation within pragmatic randomised controlled trials: what is it, why is it done, and can we find it?-a systematic review [J].
French, Caroline ;
Pinnock, Hilary ;
Forbes, Gordon ;
Skene, Imogen ;
Taylor, Stephanie J. C. .
TRIALS, 2020, 21 (01)