Effectiveness and Safety of Tenofovir Amibufenamide in the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B: A Real-world, Multicenter Study

Background and Aims: Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) remains a significant global health challenge, and effective antiviral therapies are essential for long-term management. This study aimed to evaluate the real-world effectiveness and safety of tenofovir amibufenamide (TMF) in a cohort of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Methods: In this multicenter, prospective, real-world cohort study, 194 CHB patients were recruited from four hospitals between August 2021 and August 2022. Patients were divided into treatment-na & iuml;ve (TN, n = 123) and treatment-experienced (TE, n = 71) groups. The TN group was further subdivided into TMF (n = 63) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF, n = 60) subgroups. In the TE group, patients transitioned from prior antiviral therapies (entecavir or TDF) to TMF after meeting criteria for poor virological response or safety concerns. Treatment response was evaluated in terms of virological effectiveness and alanine transaminase normalization rates. Virological response (VR), ALT normalization rates, renal function markers, and lipid profiles were monitored. Results: In the TN cohort, VR rates at 24 and 48 weeks were 42.86% and 90.48% for TMF, and 60.00% and 83.33% for TDF. ALT normalization rates at 24 and 48 weeks for TMF were 56.82% and 70.45% (according to AASLD 2018 standards). In the TE group, VR rates at 24 and 48 weeks were 83.1% and 91.55%, respectively. ALT normalization rates were 86.67% and 93.33% (local standards), and 66.67% and 76.67% (AASLD 2018 standards) (z = -2.822, P = 0.005). Additionally, TMF showed improved renal safety over TDF, with no significant differences in lipid concentrations. Conclusions: TMF is comparable to TDF in terms of CHB treatment effectiveness, with better renal safe ty and no impact on lipid levels. In TE patients, transitioning to TMF therapy does not affect antiviral treatment outcomes.