The effects of L2 proficiency on L2 word reading strategies: evidence from Chinese-English bilinguals

被引:0
|
作者
Zhao, Rong [1 ]
Wei, Hang [1 ]
Yao, Zhao [1 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Foreign Studies, Xian, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Chinese-English bilinguals; lexical processing; L2; proficiency; L2 word reading; sublexical processing; CROSS-LANGUAGE TRANSFER; DUAL-ROUTE; RECOGNITION; L1; MODELS; 1ST; CONSISTENCY; KNOWLEDGE; LEARNERS; READERS;
D O I
10.1017/S0142716424000432
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
The dual route cascaded (DRC) model proposes that the mapping from orthography to phonology occurs through two pathways: the sublexical and lexical routes. Cross-linguistic studies have found that Chinese character reading relies more on the lexical pathway, whereas English word reading relies more on the sublexical pathway. However, it remains unclear how these two pathways collaborate in the L2 word reading of Chinese-English bilinguals and whether their reading strategies are influenced by L2 proficiency. In the current study, 72 Chinese-English bilinguals with varying levels of L2 proficiency were tested. They were asked to name English words that varied in frequency and spelling-sound consistency. The results showed that participants with lower L2 proficiency were more sensitive to frequency, indicating a greater reliance on lexical processing in L2 word reading. In contrast, participants with higher L2 proficiency were more sensitive to consistency, suggesting a greater reliance on sublexical processing. These findings suggest that L2 word reading strategies vary as a function of L2 proficiency. As L2 proficiency increases, Chinese-English bilinguals' reading strategies may shift from primarily relying on lexical to sublexical processing. This study provides evidence from L2 readers for the DRC model, helping to broaden the explanatory scope of the model.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The moderating effects of L2 proficiency on the relationship between reading and writing in L2 and across L1 and L2
    Kim, Kyung Ja
    Pae, Tae-Il
    FOREIGN LANGUAGE ANNALS, 2023, 56 (01) : 75 - 101
  • [22] Does lexical category matter in effects of emotionality on L2 word processing in late proficient Chinese-English bilinguals? An ERP study
    Liao, Xiaogen
    Li, Xueni
    Ni, Chuanbin
    COGNITIVE PROCESSING, 2024,
  • [23] Can Word-Word Space Facilitate L2 Chinese Reading: Evidence From the Two Empirical Studies by Advanced L2 Learners of Mandarin Chinese
    Chen, Ken
    Gu, Lei
    Zuo, Hongshan
    Bai, Qiaoyan
    SAGE OPEN, 2021, 11 (04):
  • [24] A Key Factor Affecting L2( English) Vocabulary Acquisition: L2( English) Proficiency
    周祁林
    教师, 2014, (29) : 54 - 55
  • [25] The neurocognitive mechanisms of semantic gender processing in L1 and L2 personal nouns by Chinese-English bilinguals
    Yu, Zhibin
    Dong, Yanping
    LANGUAGE COGNITION AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 34 (07) : 901 - 915
  • [26] The effects of working memory and L2 proficiency on L2 writing
    Vasylets, Olena
    Marin, Javier
    JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2021, 52
  • [27] The influence of cognitive control on the processing of L2 garden path sentence among Chinese-English bilinguals
    Xie, Zhilong
    Zeng, Guofang
    Zhou, Shuya
    Wang, Juan
    FRONTIERS IN BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 16
  • [28] L2 ACCENT AND INTELLIGIBILITY BY CHINESE L2 SPEAKERS OF ENGLISH
    Lan, Yizhou
    Xie, Tongtong
    2021 24TH CONFERENCE OF THE ORIENTAL COCOSDA INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR THE CO-ORDINATION AND STANDARDISATION OF SPEECH DATABASES AND ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUES (O-COCOSDA), 2021, : 82 - 87
  • [29] Strategies of clausal postmodification in learner English L1 effects and L2 proficiency
    van Vuuren, Sanne
    Berns, Janine
    Bank, Marketa
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEARNER CORPUS RESEARCH, 2022, 8 (02) : 157 - 189
  • [30] L2 reading in multilingual Eritrea: The influences of L1 reading and English proficiency
    Asfaha, Yonas Mesfun
    Beckman, Danielle
    Kurvers, Jeanne
    Kroon, Sjaak
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN READING, 2009, 32 (04) : 351 - 365