Comparison of Spring Phenology from Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence, Vegetation Index, and Ground Observations in Boreal Forests

Spring phenology (start of growing season, SOS) in boreal forests plays a crucial role in the global carbon cycle. At present, more and more researchers are using solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) to evaluate the land surface phenology of boreal forests, but few studies have utilized the primary SIF directly detected by satellites (e.g., GOME-2 SIF) to estimate phenology, and most SIF datasets used are high-resolution products (e.g., GOSIF and CSIF) constructed by models with vegetation indices (VIs) and meteorological data. Thus, the difference and consistency between them in detecting the seasonal dynamics of boreal forests remain unclear. In this study, a comparison of spring phenology from GOME-2 SIF, GOSIF, EVI2 (MCD12Q2), and FLUX tower sites, PEP725 phenology observation sites, was conducted. Compared with GOSIF and EVI2, the primary GOME-2 SIF indicated a slightly earlier spring phenology onset date (about 5 days earlier on average) in boreal forests, at a regional scale; however, SOSs and SOS-climate relationships from GOME-2 SIF, GOSIF, and EVI2 showed significant correlations with the ground observations at a site scale. Regarding the absolute values of spring phenology onset date, GOME-2 SIF and FLUX-GPP had an average difference of 8 days, while GOSIF and EVI2 differed from FLUX-GPP by 16 days and 12 days, respectively. GOME-2 SIF and PEP725 had an average difference of 38 days, while GOSIF and EVI2 differed from PEP725 by 24 days and 23 days, respectively. This demonstrated the complementary roles of the three remote sensing datasets when studying spring phenology and its relationship with climate in boreal forests, enriching the available remote sensing data sources for phenological research.