Ancestral Instrument Method for Causal Inference without Complete Knowledge

被引:0
|
作者
Cheng, Debo [1 ]
Li, Jiuyong [1 ]
Liu, Lin [1 ]
Zhang, Jiji [2 ]
Le, Thuc duy [1 ]
Liu, Jixue [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Australia, STEM, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Dept Relig & Philosophy, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTY-FIRST INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, IJCAI 2022 | 2022年
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
VARIABLES; MODELS; LATENT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Unobserved confounding is the main obstacle to causal effect estimation from observational data. Instrumental variables (IVs) are widely used for causal effect estimation when there exist latent confounders. With the standard IV method, when a given IV is valid, unbiased estimation can be obtained, but the validity requirement on a standard IV is strict and untestable. Conditional IVs have been proposed to relax the requirement of standard IVs by conditioning on a set of observed variables (known as a conditioning set for a conditional IV). However, the criterion for finding a conditioning set for a conditional IV needs a directed acyclic graph (DAG) representing the causal relationships of both observed and unobserved variables. This makes it challenging to discover a conditioning set directly from data. In this paper, by leveraging maximal ancestral graphs (MAGs) for causal inference with latent variables, we study the graphical properties of ancestral IVs, a type of conditional IVs using MAGs, and develop the theory to support data-driven discovery of the conditioning set for a given ancestral IV in data under the pretreatment variable assumption. Based on the theory, we develop an algorithm for unbiased causal effect estimation with a given ancestral IV and observational data. Extensive experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate the performance of the algorithm in comparison with existing IV methods.
引用
收藏
页码:4843 / 4849
页数:7
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Ancestral Causal Inference
    Magliacane, Sara
    Claassen, Tom
    Mooij, Joris M.
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 29 (NIPS 2016), 2016, 29
  • [2] Discovering Ancestral Instrumental Variables for Causal Inference From Observational Data
    Cheng, Debo
    Li, Jiuyong
    Liu, Lin
    Yu, Kui
    Le, Thuc Duy
    Liu, Jixue
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS AND LEARNING SYSTEMS, 2024, 35 (08) : 11542 - 11552
  • [3] Without Commitment to an Ontology, There Could Be No Causal Inference
    Sarvet, Aaron L.
    Stensrud, Mats J.
    EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2022, 33 (03) : 372 - 378
  • [4] Proximal causal inference without uniqueness assumptions
    Zhang, Jeffrey
    Li, Wei
    Miao, Wang
    Tchetgen, Eric Tchetgen
    STATISTICS & PROBABILITY LETTERS, 2023, 198
  • [5] Deep Knowledge Tracing Integrating Temporal Causal Inference and PINN
    Lu, Faming
    Li, Yingran
    Bao, Yunxia
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2025, 15 (03):
  • [6] Inference reasoning on fishers' knowledge using Bayesian causal maps
    de Beaufort, Louis Bonneau
    Sedki, Karima
    Fontenelle, Guy
    ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS, 2015, 30 : 345 - 355
  • [7] Regression Discontinuity Designs in Epidemiology Causal Inference Without Randomized Trials
    Bor, Jacob
    Moscoe, Ellen
    Mutevedzi, Portia
    Newell, Marie-Louise
    Baernighausen, Till
    EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 25 (05) : 729 - 737
  • [8] Using Domain Knowledge to Overcome Latent Variables in Causal Inference from Time Series
    Zheng, Min
    Kleinberg, Samantha
    MACHINE LEARNING FOR HEALTHCARE CONFERENCE, VOL 106, 2019, 106
  • [9] Sound and complete causal identification with latent variables given local background knowledge
    Wang, Tian-Zuo
    Qin, Tian
    Zhou, Zhi-Hua
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2023, 322
  • [10] Misaccounting for endogeneity: The peril of relying on the Heckman two-step method without a valid instrument
    Wolfolds, Sarah E.
    Siegel, Jordan
    STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2019, 40 (03) : 432 - 462