Prostate Virtual High-dose-rate Brachytherapy Boost: 5-Year Results from the PROMETHEUS Prospective Multicentre Trial

被引:1
作者
Wegener, Eric [1 ,2 ]
Sidhom, Mark [3 ,4 ]
Pryor, David [5 ,6 ]
Bucci, Joseph [4 ,7 ]
Yeoh, Kenway [8 ]
Richardson, Matthew [8 ]
Greer, Peter [2 ,8 ]
Wilton, Lee [8 ]
Gallagher, Sarah [8 ]
Schmidt, Laurel [7 ]
Arumugam, Sankar [3 ,4 ]
Keats, Sarah [3 ]
Brown, Simon [5 ]
Glyde, Alan [5 ]
Martin, Jarad M. [1 ,2 ,8 ]
机构
[1] GenesisCare Maitland, Maitland, Australia
[2] Univ Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
[3] Liverpool & Macarthur Canc Therapy Ctr, Sydney, Australia
[4] Univ New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
[5] Princess Alexandra Hosp, Brisbane, Australia
[6] Queensland Univ Technol, Brisbane, Australia
[7] St George Hosp, Canc Care Ctr, Sydney, Australia
[8] Calvary Mater Newcastle Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Newcastle, Australia
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY | 2024年 / 7卷 / 05期
关键词
Stereotactic; Radiation; Boost; Prostate cancer; STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIOTHERAPY; EXTERNAL-BEAM BOOST; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; RADIATION-THERAPY; ASCENDE-RT; PACE-B; CANCER; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.euo.2024.01.008
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and objective: Despite the high efficacy of high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost (HDRB) in the management of prostate cancer (PC), use of this approach is declining. Similar dosimetry can be achieved using stereotactic body radiotherapy or "virtual HDRB" (vHDRB). The aim of the multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 PROMETHEUS trial (ACTRN12615000223538) was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of vHDRB in patients with PC. Methods: Patients with intermediate-risk PC or selected patients with high-risk PC were eligible for inclusion. vHDRB was given as 19-20 Gy in two fractions, delivered 1 wk apart, followed by conventionally fractionated external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) at 46 Gy in 23 fractions or 36 Gy in 12 fractions. The primary endpoint was the biochemical/clinical relapse-free rate (bcRFR). Toxicity was graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4 and quality of life (QoL) data were collected used the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 questionnaire. Key findings and limitations: From March 2014 to December 2018, 151 patients (74% intermediate risk, 26% high risk) with a median age of 69 yr were treated across five centres. Median follow-up was 60 mo. The 5-yr bcRFR was 94.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 90-98%) and the local control rate was 98.7%. Acute grade 2 gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity occurred in 6.6% and 23.2% of patients, respectively, with no acute grade 3 toxicity. At 60 mo after treatment, the prevalence of late grade >= 2 GI toxicity was 1.7% (95% CI 0.3-6.5%) and the prevalence of late grade >= 2 GU toxicity was 3.3% (95% CI 1.1-8.8%). Between baseline and 60 mo, QoL improved for urinary obstructive and hormonal domains, was stable for the bowel domain, and deteriorated slightly for the sexual and urinary incontinence domains. Conclusions: Delivery of gantry-based vHDRB followed by conventionally fractionated EBRT is feasible in a multicentre setting, with high 5-yr bcRFR and low toxicity. This approach is being compared with prostate ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy in the TROG 18.01 NINJA randomised trial (ACTRN12618001806257). Patient summary: The PROMETHEUS trial investigated noninvasive high-dose precision radiotherapy combined with conventional radiotherapy in patients with prostate cancer. We found that this new technique was well tolerated and resulted in better cancer control outcomes than historically reported. (c) 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association of Urology. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:1042 / 1050
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2023, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic
[2]   An online x-ray based position validation system for prostate hypofractionated radiotherapy [J].
Arumugam, Sankar ;
Sidhom, Mark ;
Xing, Aitang ;
Holloway, Lois .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (02) :961-974
[3]   Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Boost in Combination With Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Single-Institution Propensity Score Matched Analysis [J].
Chen, William C. ;
Li, Yun ;
Lazar, Ann ;
Altun, Aysu ;
Descovich, Martina ;
Nano, Tomi ;
Ziemer, Benjamin ;
Sudhyadhom, Atchar ;
Cunha, Adam ;
Thomas, Horatio ;
Gottschalk, Alexander ;
Hsu, I-Chow ;
Roach III, Mack .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2021, 110 (02) :429-437
[4]   Long-Term Results of a Randomized Trial Comparing Iridium Implant Plus External Beam Radiation Therapy With External Beam Radiation Therapy Alone in Node-Negative Locally Advanced Cancer of the Prostate [J].
Dayes, Ian S. ;
Parpia, Sameer ;
Gilbert, Jaclyn ;
Julian, Jim A. ;
Davis, Ian R. ;
Levine, Mark N. ;
Sathya, Jinka .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2017, 99 (01) :90-93
[5]   Results of a Prospective Dose Escalation Study of Linear Accelerator-Based Virtual Brachytherapy (BOOSTER) for Prostate Cancer; Virtual HDR Brachytherapy for Prostate Cancer [J].
Eade, Thomas ;
Hruby, George ;
Booth, Jeremy ;
Bromley, Regina ;
Guo, Lesley ;
O'Toole, Andrew ;
Le, Andrew ;
Wu, Kenny ;
Whitaker, May ;
Rasiah, Krishan ;
Chalasani, Venu ;
Vass, Justin ;
Kwong, Carolyn ;
Atyeo, John ;
Kneebone, Andrew .
ADVANCES IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 4 (04) :623-630
[6]   Extent of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection and the Impact of Standard Template Dissection on Nomogram Prediction of Lymph Node Involvement [J].
Godoy, Guilherme ;
Chong, Kian Tai ;
Cronin, Angel ;
Vickers, Andrew ;
Laudone, Vincent ;
Touijer, Karim ;
Guillonneau, Bertrand ;
Eastham, James A. ;
Scardino, Peter T. ;
Coleman, Jonathan A. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2011, 60 (02) :195-201
[7]   Patterns of Failure Following External Beam Radiotherapy With or Without an Additional Focal Boost in the Randomized Controlled FLAME Trial for Localized Prostate Cancer [J].
Groen, Veerle H. ;
Haustermans, Karin ;
Pos, Floris J. ;
Draulans, Cedric ;
Isebaert, Sofie ;
Monninkhof, Evelyn M. ;
Smeenk, Robert J. ;
Kunze-Busch, Martina ;
de Boer, Johannes C. J. ;
van Zijp, Jochem van der Voort ;
Kerkmeijer, Linda G. W. ;
van der Heide, Uulke A. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2022, 82 (03) :252-257
[8]   Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA): a prospective, randomised, multicentre study [J].
Hofman, Michael S. ;
Lawrentschuk, Nathan ;
Francis, Roslyn J. ;
Tang, Colin ;
Vela, Ian ;
Thomas, Paul ;
Rutherford, Natalie ;
Martin, Jarad M. ;
Frydenberg, Mark ;
Shakher, Ramdave ;
Wong, Lih-Ming ;
Taubman, Kim ;
Lee, Sze Ting ;
Hsiao, Edward ;
Roach, Paul ;
Nottage, Michelle ;
Kirkwood, Ian ;
Hayne, Dickon ;
Link, Emma ;
Marusic, Petra ;
Matera, Anetta ;
Herschtal, Alan ;
Iravani, Amir ;
Hicks, Rodney J. ;
Williams, Scott ;
Murphy, Declan G. .
LANCET, 2020, 395 (10231) :1208-1216
[9]   Randomised trial of external-beam radiotherapy alone or with high-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer: Mature 12-year results [J].
Hoskin, Peter J. ;
Rojas, Ana M. ;
Ostler, Peter J. ;
Bryant, Linda ;
Lowe, Gerry J. .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 154 :214-219
[10]   Real-Time Image Guided Ablative Prostate Cancer Radiation Therapy: Results From the TROG 15.01 SPARK Trial [J].
Keall, Paul ;
Nguyen, Doan Trang ;
O'Brien, Ricky ;
Hewson, Emily ;
Ball, Helen ;
Poulsen, Per ;
Booth, Jeremy ;
Greer, Peter ;
Hunter, Perry ;
Wilton, Lee ;
Bromley, Regina ;
Kipritidis, John ;
Eade, Thomas ;
Kneebone, Andrew ;
Hruby, George ;
Moodie, Trevor ;
Hayden, Amy ;
Turner, Sandra ;
Arumugam, Sankar ;
Sidhom, Mark ;
Hardcastle, Nicholas ;
Siva, Shankar ;
Tai, Keen-Hun ;
Gebski, Val ;
Martin, Jarad .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 107 (03) :530-538